> + reg1: regulator@1 {
> + };
> +
> +/* SoC properties */
> +
> + csis@1188 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-csis";
> + reg = <0x1188 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <0 78 0>;
> + cell-inde
etrieve
this information.
4. sync signals are available and supported by both peers, but for some
reason the user prefers to use embedded sync data - is such a case
feasible? Even if so, this should be run-time configurable then?
So, maybe we don't need these at all.
Thanks
Guennadi
> + reg = <0x1188 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <0 78 0>;
> + cell-index = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + camera {
> + compatible = "samsung,fimc";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> +
of the device's memory
> mapped
> +registers;
> +- interrupts : should contain FIMC-LITE interrupt;
> +- cell-index : FIMC-LITE IP instance index;
Same as in an earlier patch - not sure this is needed.
Thanks
Guennadi
> +
> +
> Example:
>
> fimc0:
= <&gpl2 0 2 0 3>;
> + gpio-stby = <&gpl2 1 2 0 3>;
> + video-itu-601-bus;
> + vdd_core-supply = <®0>;
> + vdda-supply = <®1>;
> + vdd_reg-supply = <®2>;
> + vddio-supply = <®3>;
> + };
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
camclk-id : the SoC CAM_MCLK clock output index. These clocks
> +are master clocks for external image processors.
> +If this property is not specified a default 0 value
> + will be used by driver.
> +
> + "video-bus-type" and &quo
Hi Sylwester
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 11:15 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/soc/samsung-fimc.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/soc/samsung-fimc.txt
> > &g
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 11:13 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
> >> Signed-off-by: Karol Lewandowski
> >> Signe
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Tuesday 17 July 2012 20:16:23 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 07/16/2012 10:55 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi Sylwester
> > >
> > > Thanks for your comments to my RFC and f
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 07/16/2012 11:42 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > >> The driver init
g, not the global SoC pin function
configuration?
Thanks
Guennadi
> > > For receivers that can't reroute lanes internally, the data-lanes property
> > > would be need to specify lanes in sequence.
> > >
> > > data-lanes =<1 2 3>;
> >
> >
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > > On 07/16/
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Thu,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:29:55 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > On Tue,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 02:26 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >>>> But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?
> >>>
> >>> I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there an
Hi Sylwester
Thanks for picking up these patches! In general both look good to me, just
a couple of nit-picks, that I couldn't help remarking:-)
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
>
> This patch adds a document describing common OF bind
4l2-of.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
> +/*
> + * V4L2 OF binding parsing library
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> + * Author: Guennadi Liakhovetski
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms o
Hi Sylwester
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> On 01/02/2013 12:31 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Sylwester
> >
> > Thanks for picking up these patches! In general both look good to me, just
> > a couple of nit-pick
if (IS_ERR(clk))
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
/*
* enable the clock - this needs a subdev pointer, that we stored
* in the clock object for the bridge driver to use with
* v4l2_clk_get() above
*/
v4l2_clk_enable(clk);
do_probe();
if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) {
> + dev_err(&host->dev, "platform data not available\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> if (!host->pdata->select_slot && host->pdata->num_slots
Hi Thomas
On Sat, 12 May 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 4 May 2012 04:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > What do you think about this patch
> >
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg11259.html
> >
> > and about using mmc-generic OF pro
++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!np)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,card-wired", NULL))
> + if (of_get_property(np, "non-removable"
22 matches
Mail list logo
