Re: [PATCH] video: exynos: fix modular build

2015-05-20 Thread Paul Bolle
Is the -mod extension needed because a module built from multiple files can't have a name that matches the name of one of its .c files (minus the .c extension, of course)? > obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_LCD_S6E8AX0) += s6e8ax0.o Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

drm/exynos: DRM_EXYNOS7DECON?

2015-02-17 Thread Paul Bolle
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig). Is the trivial patch to correct this typo queued somewhere? (This assumes an optional dependency on DRM_EXYNOS7_DECON is actually needed for DRM_EXYNOS_DP, of course.) Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-s

Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung: clean up references to outdated Kconfig symbols

2015-02-11 Thread Paul Bolle
TL;DR: what exactly should I resend and when? On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:07 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:38:04AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > Patches 2/4, 3/4, and 4/4 didn't apply. Locally I carry them in a tree > > that constantly rebases o

Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung: clean up references to outdated Kconfig symbols

2015-02-07 Thread Paul Bolle
On Sat, 2015-02-07 at 07:50 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > A few series of ARM cleanups regarding S5PC100 and S5PV210 were included > > in v3.17. These series removed these five Kconfig symbols: > > MACH_AQU

Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] misc: Add cros_ec_lpc driver for x86 devices

2015-01-29 Thread Paul Bolle
If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS EC > + over an LPC bus. This uses a simple byte-level protocol with a > + checksum. This is used for userspace access only. The kernel > + typically has its own communication methods. > + What happe

[PATCH 4/4] ASoC: samsung: remove outdated Kconfig references

2015-01-19 Thread Paul Bolle
as MACH_S5PV210_DT). But apparently no one noticed that these references were pointless ever since v3.17. So it seems they can simply be removed. Let's do that now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --

[PATCH 2/4] ASoC: samsung: Remove PCM support for WM8580 on SMDK

2015-01-19 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit 28c8331d386a ("ARM: S5PV210: Remove support for board files") removed the Kconfig symbols MACH_SMDKC110 and MACH_SMDKV210. As a result the dependencies of SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580_PCM can never be met. So remove the unbuildable "SoC PCM Audio support for WM8580 on SMDK".

[PATCH 3/4] ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDKC100 isn't supported anymore

2015-01-19 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit b8529ec1c1b0 ("ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC") removed Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKC100. But there are still two references to that symbol left. These are now pointless. Remove them too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Apparently Kukjin had a fixup queued (see http://ma

[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: samsung: Remove goni or aquila with the WM8994

2015-01-19 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit 28c8331d386a ("ARM: S5PV210: Remove support for board files") removed the Kconfig symbols MACH_GONI and MACH_AQUILA. As a result the dependencies of SND_SOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994 can never be met. So remove the unbuildable "SoC I2S Audio support for AQUILA/GONI - WM8994".

[PATCH 0/4] ASoC: samsung: clean up references to outdated Kconfig symbols

2015-01-19 Thread Paul Bolle
those five symbols. (The first two patches are actually resends.) Paul Bolle (4): ASoC: samsung: Remove goni or aquila with the WM8994 ASoC: samsung: Remove PCM support for WM8580 on SMDK ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDKC100 isn't supported anymore ASoC: samsung: remove outdated Kconfig refer

Re: [PATCH v3] usb: Remove references to non-existent PLAT_S5P symbol

2014-11-04 Thread Paul Bolle
ce me otherwise :) Sylwester, was I right in thinking that users of PLAT_S5P, who could set USB_EHCI_EXYNOS or USB_OHCI_EXYNOS pre v3.17, got, well, transferred to ARCH_S5PV210 and lost the ability to set one of those symbols in v3.17? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &qu

Re: [PATCH v3] usb: Remove references to non-existent PLAT_S5P symbol

2014-11-04 Thread Paul Bolle
it's me that should be educated here. Why is a patch that allows the users of ARCH_S5PV210 to set USB_EHCI_EXYNOS or USB_OHCI_EXYNOS - which they apparently need - for a v3.17.y kernel, not a stable issue? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux

Re: [PATCH] usb: Remove references to non-existent PLAT_S5P symbol

2014-10-06 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 17:47 +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > The PLAT_S5P Kconfig symbol was removed in commit d78c16ccde96 > ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code"). There are still > some references left, fix that by replacing them with ARCH_S5PV210. > >

Re: [PATCH v2] [media] Remove references to non-existent PLAT_S5P symbol

2014-10-06 Thread Paul Bolle
them with ARCH_S5PV210. > > Reported-by: Paul Bolle > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki Thanks for picking this up! Should Fixes: d78c16ccde96 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code") be added so this will end up in stable for v3.17? > drivers/media/platform/Kconf

[PATCH 2/4] [media] exynos4-is: Remove optional dependency on PLAT_S5P

2014-10-06 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit d78c16ccde96 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code") removed the Kconfig symbol PLAT_S5P. Remove an optional dependency on that symbol from this Kconfig file too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 inser

[PATCH 0/4] Remove optional dependencies on PLAT_S5P

2014-10-06 Thread Paul Bolle
ptional dependencies. If it turns out that they should actually be replaced by another symbol, as was said in a reply to my first message but never done, this series can be used as a reference for the places that need fixing. This series is done on top of next-20141003. It is tested by grepping

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: Remove goni or aquila with the WM8994

2014-09-24 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 18:04 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:57:07PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Mark Brown schreef op do 18-09-2014 om 10:57 [-0700]: > > > Please follow the patch submission process in SubmittingPatches. > > > Could you please be

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: Remove goni or aquila with the WM8994

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
Hi Mark, Mark Brown schreef op do 18-09-2014 om 10:57 [-0700]: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I think it would be nice if you could submit a patch to remove the > > >

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:16 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:58 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I had two patches fixing those, but apparently this was lost in action. > > The correct solution is s/PLAT_S5P/ARCH_S5PV210/. I will include this in > > a follo

[PATCH] ASoC: samsung: Remove PCM support for WM8580 on SMDK

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 04 September 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Ditto for [...] MACH_SMDKC110, and MACH_SMDKV210. Note that > > here SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580_PCM can not be set anymore. >> > [...] > I think it would be nice if

Re: ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDKC100

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
Hi Kukjin, On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 04:03 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 07/18/14 17:55, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 10:01 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> Your commit 52ad6582ceb2 ("ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC" > >> landed in next-20

[PATCH] ASoC: samsung: Remove goni or aquila with the WM8994

2014-09-18 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:02 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 04 September 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > References to MACH_GONI and MACH_AQUILA can still be seen in v3.17-rc3 > > and next-20140903. Note that as consequence SND_SOC_GONI_AQUILA_WM8994 > > c

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] devfreq: event: Add exynos-ppmu devfreq evnet driver

2014-09-12 Thread Paul Bolle
's a typo in the commit summary ("evnet"). > + select PM_OPP > + help > + This add the DEVFREQ event driver for Exynos SoC. It provides PPMU > + (Performance Profiling Monitoring Unit) counters to estimate the > + utilization of each module. > +

Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: S5PV210: Remove support for board files

2014-09-05 Thread Paul Bolle
ssages once those patches have landed? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:58 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 12:15, Paul Bolle wrote: > > After this patch that symbol is still referenced in: > > drivers/media/platform/Kconfig:159: depends on VIDEO_DEV && VIDEO_V4L2 > > && (PLAT_S5P || AR

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 15:00 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 12:24, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> -config S5P_GPIO_DRVSTR > >> - bool > >> - help > >> -Internal configuratio

Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: S5PV210: Remove support for board files

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig in another follow-up patch. Ditto for MACH_SMDKC100, MACH_SMDKC110, and MACH_SMDKV210. Note that here SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580_PCM can not be set anymore. (This is intended to be a gentile reminder. I hope it actually comes across like that.) Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe f

Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 16:35, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:26 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >>> That's right. Apparently I missed them. I gues

Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Bolle
[Use Tomasz's new address and add Sylwester.] On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 11:39 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On 16.07.2014 16:35, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:26 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > >>

Re: ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDKC100

2014-07-18 Thread Paul Bolle
Kukjin, On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 10:01 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > Your commit 52ad6582ceb2 ("ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC" > landed in next-20140702. It removed the Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKC100 > (and a lot of other stuff). > > Is the trivial patch to

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-17 Thread Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 12:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > The strange thing is that it is dated "Jun 3 2104". 2014 That must be my most common typo! Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsun

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-17 Thread Paul Bolle
Tomasz, On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:56 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 11:47, Paul Bolle wrote: > > So a second order effect is that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA can now be removed. > > Which implies that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA64 and SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 can > > also be remov

Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 16:26 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > That's right. Apparently I missed them. I guess that's not critical, > > though, and could be done in separate patch, right? > > This is not critical

Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:43 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 16.07.2014 11:27, Paul Bolle wrote: > > There are three further references to CONFIG_SAMSUNG_CLOCK in this file. > > Those should be removed too, shouldn't they? > > That's right. Apparently I missed th

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
This one is used (as a macro) in drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c. Is a patch that touches that macro queued somewhere? > config SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA > int "Number of additional GPIO pins" > default 128 if SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
depends on PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS drivers/usb/host/Kconfig:530: depends on PLAT_S5P || ARCH_EXYNOS Again, I assume patches to remove these references are pending. But is that correct? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: S5PV210: Remove support for board files

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
ort for Samsung SMDKV210 > - Ditto. > -config MACH_TORBRECK > - bool "Torbreck" > - select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE > - select CPU_S5PV210 > - select S3C_DEV_HSMMC > - select S3C_DEV_HSMMC1 > - select S3C_DEV_HSMMC2 > - select S3C_DEV_HSM

Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
hat SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA64 and SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 can also be removed. Should I submit the trivial patch to do that or is a patch already queued somewhere? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 04/19] serial: samsung: Remove support for legacy clock code

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Bolle
IG_SAMSUNG_CLOCK > -#include > -#endif > - > #include "samsung.h" > > #if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_SAMSUNG_DEBUG) && \ There are three further references to CONFIG_SAMSUNG_CLOCK in this file. Those should be removed too, shouldn't they? Paul Bolle -- To u

Re: [PATCH] mach-s3c64xx: Remove all defintions not related to regs-clocks

2014-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
the defines that covers! The output of that command is, I think, pretty clear. Nicholas, I think you've been told already to stop doing what you're doing again here. I try not to use colorful language on the net, but you're really pushing me here. Please go find something other to do than grepping the kernel tree for FIXMEs! Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDKC100

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Bolle
ig/ queued somewhere? I don't think it was part of the series that included the above commit. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

ASoC: samsung: MACH_SMDK6450

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Bolle
config (an optional dependency of SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8580_PCM). Is the oneliner to remove that optional dependency queued somewhere? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More maj

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

2014-06-17 Thread Paul Bolle
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:20 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/17/2014 02:53 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > So, in summary, while we're apparently only discussing a single comment, > > I would appreciate it if it could be reworded, preferably by dropping > > that the CONFIG

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

2014-06-17 Thread Paul Bolle
Doug, On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 08:22 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 08:11 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> This is a config option on the ChromeOS EC > >> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chr

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

2014-06-13 Thread Paul Bolle
Doug, On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 08:11 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 09:46 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> > From: Bill Richardson > >> &

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mfd: cros_ec: Sync to the latest cros_ec_commands.h from EC sources

2014-06-11 Thread Paul Bolle
t; > + > > + /* Range for CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE params */ CONFIG_CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE doesn't match anything in linux-next. Is a Kconfig symbol CHARGER_PROFILE_OVERRIDE perhaps queued somewhere? > > + CS_PARAM_CUSTOM_PROFILE_MIN = 0x1, > > + CS_PARAM

[PATCH] PM / devfreq: remove checks for CONFIG_EXYNOS_ASV

2014-05-21 Thread Paul Bolle
Checks for CONFIG_EXYNOS_ASV were added in v3.3. But the related Kconfig symbol has never been added to the tree. Remove these checks, as they always evaluate to false. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Untested. 1) I do not really care much for this patch. Two years is not very long for dead

[PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: check for 'CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK2443_WM9710'

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Bolle
guard for s3c24xx_ac97_setup_gpio(S3C24XX_AC97_GPE0); And since neither s3c24xx_ac97_setup_gpio nor S3C24XX_AC97_GPE0 are defined anywhere, that second check can be dropped entirely. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Tested with git grep. Needs further testing, obviously. arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx

[PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: remove checks for CONFIG_CPU_S3C2413

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Bolle
s for CONFIG_CPU_S3C2412. So these checks can safely be removed. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Tested with git grep only. I hope the ARM/SAMSUNG maintainers are allowed to touch s3c-i2s-v2.c in this case. Fun fact: the first checks for CONFIG_CPU_S3C2413 were added in commit 68d9ab394f06 ("[A

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Map SYSRAM through generic SRAM bindings

2014-05-13 Thread Paul Bolle
s no Kconfig symbol SYSRAM. However, there is a Kconfig symbol SRAM. Did you perhaps do one s/sram/sysram/ too many on the original patch? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2.1 3/9] ARM: S3C24XX: enable usage of common dclk if common clock framework is enabled

2014-05-09 Thread Paul Bolle
N_CLK > select S3C24XX_SIMTEC_PM if PM > select S3C_DEV_NAND > select S3C_DEV_USB_HOST > @@ -643,7 +654,8 @@ config MACH_RX1950 > select PM_H1940 if PM > select S3C2410_IOTIMING if ARM_S3C2440_CPUFREQ > select S3C2440_XTAL_16934400 > - select S3C24XX

Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: exynos: fix SATA phy license typo

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Bolle
seems these need to be changed too. But, except for dma-jz4740.c, these are all files that can't be built as (part of) a module. Which explains why no one noticed. Maybe I'll submit some trivial patches, in a few days, to clean this up. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 04/28] Remove EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU

2014-04-15 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 10:02 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > +cc linux-samsung-soc list > > On 10 February 2014 01:38, Paul Bolle wrote: > > I noted this one about a year ago (see > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/5/401 ). By now I wonder whether > > EXYNOS_IOMMU (and

[PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove two unused S3C boot options

2014-04-06 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit 19a964644f1e ("ARM: SAMSUNG: remove all custom uncompress.h") removed the only users of S3C_BOOT_ERROR_RESET and S3C_BOOT_UART_FORCE_FIFO. Remove their Kconfig entries too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 14 -- 1 file c

Re: [PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210

2014-02-28 Thread Paul Bolle
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:04 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:09:19PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > See, if you scan v3.10:arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c you'll > > notice the string "smdk-audio". If you grep that string you get a few > &g

[PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: Fix typo "CONFIG_CPUS_3C2443"

2014-02-12 Thread Paul Bolle
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. This needs testing by people with access to knowledge, compilers, and/or hardware related to CPU_S3C2443. I'm not one of them. arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3

Re: [PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 16:36 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 04:30:42PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > So, next step: the Kconfig symbols MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210 were > > removed in commit 383ffda2fa ("ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for > >

[PATCH] ASoC: smdk_wm8994: Fix typo "wm8894"

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Bolle
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) This typo was introduced in commit 0d47acc4ffaa ("ASoC: smdk_wm8994: Make driver name more unique"). 1) So currently there's a difference between platform_drive.driver.name and the (sub)string used in MODULE_ALIAS(). If I'd understand

Re: [PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:12 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > If so, to be absolutely sure we start from the same point: do you agree > > that the above line now effectively reads > > depends on SND_SOC_SAMS

Re: [PATCH 14/28] Remove MACH_SMDKC210

2014-02-10 Thread Paul Bolle
to be absolutely sure we start from the same point: do you agree that the above line now effectively reads depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110 || false || false) because there's neither a Kconfig symbol MACH_SMDKV310 nor a Kcon

[PATCH] ARM: s3c24xx: get rid of unneeded selects

2014-02-09 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit c67d0f29262b ("ARM: s3c24xx: get rid of custom ") got rid of the Kconfig symbols S3C24XX_GPIO_EXTRA64 and S3C24XX_GPIO_EXTRA128. It missed one select of both of these symbols, so get rid of those now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig | 2

Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

2013-12-07 Thread Paul Bolle
rnate"), on top of v3.13-rc3, also lead to a successful hibernation/thaw cycle. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove references to non-DT SoCs

2013-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
t to the system used for SoC. Since then you've received a number of patches from me that, as far as I can remember, always used that system. Besides, this patch was intended as a follow up to commit 383ffda2fa, to clean up two references it apparently forgot to remove, and therefor basically cop

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove references to non-DT SoCs

2013-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit 383ffda2fa ("ARM: EXYNOS: no more support non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs") removed the Kconfig symbols MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210. Now remove the references to both of these symbols from the Kconfig entry for SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM9713. They're not needed anymore. Signed-off

[PATCH] cpufreq: s3c24xx: fix typo "ARM_S3C24XX"

2013-07-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Kconfig symbol S3C24XX_PLL depends on ARM_S3C24XX. But that symbol doesn't exist. Commit f023f8dd59bf ("cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq"), which added this typo, makes clear that ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ was intended here. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untes

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove "config EXYNOS_DEV_DRM"

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
The only user of Kconfig symbol EXYNOS_DEV_DRM was removed in commit 0a9d5ac307aefbb2c772537d3fe7f75046d563ac ("ARM: EXYNOS: removing exynos-drm device registration from non-dt platforms"). It is safe to remove this symbol too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Only "git grep"

[PATCH] ARM: S5P64X0: Fix typo "CONFIG_S5P64X0_SETUP_SDHCI"

2013-03-30 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit ebc433c2890f8ecad2da39fe2dbf2b6e7b309afa ("ARM: S5P64X0: Add HSMMC setup for host Controller") added the Kconfig symbol S5P64X0_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO. By accident it also used a macro CONFIG_S5P64X0_SETUP_SDHCI. Fix that typo. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. Since this typo h

[PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: remove obsolete Makefile line

2013-03-29 Thread Paul Bolle
anymore and arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-spi.c was already removed. So we can remove this line. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile index f9ce1dc..

[PATCH] ARM: Fix typo "CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DEV_RTC"

2013-03-29 Thread Paul Bolle
CONFIG_S3C_DEV_RTC here. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Untested. 1) Introduced in commit commit b2994d318dc78c9a4a43605629f00217335ada28 ("ARM: S3C2443/S3C2416: add s3c_rtc_setname and rename rtc devices"), which shipped in v3.4. Should this go to stable too (after testing)? arc

[PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove useless Samsung GPIO related CONFIG

2013-03-21 Thread Paul Bolle
The Kconfig entry for S3C_GPIO_CFG_S3C64XX was missed by commit 5ec7414494ed1204c9e2ed0b8232b29860d0986f ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove useless Samsung GPIO related CONFIGs"). Remove it now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6

[PATCH] S3C24XX: remove unneeded "config SMDK2440_CPU2442"

2013-03-20 Thread Paul Bolle
because it now depended on that same symbol. But without its select this entry became a nop: enabling it has no effect, as it changes no code. It can safely be removed. Fix a related, and trivial, comment typo too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig | 5 +--

[PATCH v2] mfd: remove twelve unused Kconfig symbols

2013-03-20 Thread Paul Bolle
Twelve Kconfig symbols, all related to WM8350, WM8351, and WM8352, are unused. Commit 19d57ed5a308472a02e773f33c03ad4cb2ec6a9 ("mfd: Remove custom wm8350 cache implementation") removed all their (actual) users. Remove these symbols too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle Acked-by: Mark Brown -

[PATCH] ARM: samsung: remove "config S3C_BOOT_WATCHDOG"

2013-03-15 Thread Paul Bolle
All users of S3C_BOOT_WATCHDOG got removed in commit 1ff5f55a8c7b011f818434923a93afc48de0b2ee ("ARM: samsung: remove unused arch_decomp_wdog() code"). Remove this symbol too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Untested. 1) Commit 1ff5f55a8c7b011f818434923a93afc48de0b2ee st

[PATCH] ASoC: samsung: remove last traces of neo1973-gta01

2013-03-12 Thread Paul Bolle
The (rudimentary) support for the Openmoko Neo1973 GTA01 got removed in commit 1ae5cbc52e7c6619a3f44b87809fd25370df31bb ("ASoC: neo1973_wm8753: remove references to the neo1973-gta01 machine"). Remove its last traces in the Kconfig file too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested.

[PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: drop "select MACH_NEO1973"

2013-03-09 Thread Paul Bolle
The Kconfig entry for the Openmoko GTA02 / Freerunner phone selects MACH_NEO1973. But there is no Kconfig symbol MACH_NEO1973. The select statement for that symbol is a nop. It can safely be dropped. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Tested with "git grep". 1) There appear to be re

Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: change HAVE_SAMSUNG_KEYPAD to KEYBOARD_SAMSUNG

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Bolle
r hex strings in commit explanations (which is quite nice). Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU entirely

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Bolle
status of EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU around (say) v3.10-rc1? If so, that's fine with me. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: drop "select MACH_N35"

2013-03-06 Thread Paul Bolle
dare to touch it. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] ARM: S3C24XX: drop "select MACH_N35"

2013-03-06 Thread Paul Bolle
The unused Kconfig symbol MACH_N35 was removed in commit 85fd6d63bf2927b9da7ab1b0d46723bfdb13808c ("ARM: S3C2410: move mach-s3c2410/* into mach-s3c24xx/"). But there is still one (pointless) select statement for that symbol. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- arch/arm/mach-s3c24

[PATCH] ARM: drop "select HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK"

2013-03-06 Thread Paul Bolle
The Kconfig symbol HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK got removed in v3.4, with commit 6905a65879b51d326396e63dfea40861a30bc17f ("ARM: Make the sched_clock framework mandatory"). Drop the last two select statements for that symbol too. They're useless now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Tested with

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: change HAVE_SAMSUNG_KEYPAD to KEYBOARD_SAMSUNG

2013-03-06 Thread Paul Bolle
ment depends on INPUT_KEYBOARD this entry should select KEYBOARD_SAMSUNG instead. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Tested with "git grep" only. 1) Perhaps the fact that the symbol KEYBOARD_SAMSUNG enables a driver called samsung-keypad caused confusion here. Anyhow, my choice for KEYBOARD

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU entirely

2013-03-05 Thread Paul Bolle
Commit 25e9d28d927d2e1731df53f60cde53d75bcb7c36 ("ARM: EXYNOS: remove system mmu initialization from exynos tree") removed the Kconfig symbol EXYNOS_DEV_SYSMMU. Remove its last traces too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Untested. 1) Please note that this patch changes the depen

ARM: s3c2410: remove dead mach-s3c2410 directory

2012-06-25 Thread Paul Bolle
rnel. This directory can safely be removed. Also delete two lines from mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig that now also become meaningless. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Tested only with a number of git commands. 1) Previously discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/22/26 . arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/Kconfig

[PATCH] ARM: remove unused SPI clock headers

2012-06-13 Thread Paul Bolle
afely be removed now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- 0) Only tested by using various git commands on the (history of the) tree. 1) The history of arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/spi-clocks.h actually differs from the history of the other four headers. It got added by commit 74ac23a3e4962bf4f935a5579a

Re: arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/Kconfig is unsourced

2012-06-10 Thread Paul Bolle
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:05 -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Paul Bolle wrote: > > 0) commit 85fd6d63bf2927b9da7ab1b0d46723bfdb13808c ("ARM: S3C2410: move > > mach-s3c2410/* into mach-s3c24xx/") orphaned > > arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/Kconfig: currently nothing sourc

[PATCH] ARM: s3c24xx: remove unused header

2012-06-07 Thread Paul Bolle
header can safely be removed. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Tested with "git grep". But it's again hard to imagine how this could break anything. arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/include/mach/bast-pmu.h | 40 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) delete m

arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/Kconfig is unsourced

2012-04-22 Thread Paul Bolle
;, into nops (both in arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig). 2) So to me it seems the move has only been done half: either more things needs to be moved or those things can be removed entirely. But perhaps arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/Kconfig should just be sourced again. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from thi