Hi, Could you rebase your serie onto linux-next or 4.2-rc8 ? it does not apply here...
Regards, Romain 2015-08-21 15:16 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:24:16PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: >> On 2015. 8. 21., at PM 7:01, Yakir Yang <y...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Jingoo, >> > >> >> 在 2015/8/21 16:20, Jingoo Han 写道: >> >>> On 2015. 8. 19., at PM 11:48, Yakir Yang <y...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> ..... >> >> >> >>> .../bindings/video/analogix_dp-rockchip.txt | 83 ++ >> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/video/exynos_dp.txt | 51 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 10 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 10 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 12 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-spring.dts | 12 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts | 12 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 10 +- >> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 12 +- >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig | 5 + >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Makefile | 1 + >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.c | 1382 >> >>> +++++++++++++++++++ >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_core.h | 286 ++++ >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix_dp_reg.c | 1294 >> >>> ++++++++++++++++++ >> >>> .../exynos_dp_reg.h => bridge/analogix_dp_reg.h} | 270 ++-- >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig | 5 +- >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Makefile | 2 +- >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/analogix_dp-exynos.c | 347 +++++ >> >> Would you change this file name to "exynos_dp.c"? >> > >> > Sorry, I don't think so ;( >> > >> > I think IP_name+Soc_name would be better in this re-use case. >> >> So? Is there the naming rule such as "IP_name+SoC_name"? >> >> > Beside I see >> > there are lots of driver named with this format in kernel, such as dw_hdmi >> > & dw_mmc >> >> Please look at other dw cases. >> For example, look at dw_pcie. >> >> drivers/pci/host/ >> pcie-designware.c >> pci-spear13xx.c >> pci-exynos.c >> >> In this case, pci-spear13xx.c and pci-exynos.c do not use >> "IP_name+SoC_name", even though these are dw IPs. >> >> Also, naming consistency is more important. >> Now, Exynos DRM files are using "exynos_drm_" prefix. >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/ >> exynos_drm_buf.c >> exynos_drm_core.c >> .... >> >> However, "analogix_dp-exynos.c" looks very inconsistent. >> >> If there is no strict naming rule, please use "exynos_dp.c" >> or "exynos_drm_dp.c". > > Exynos DRM maintainers get to pick their filenames, so Yakir, please > rename as Jingoo suggested. > > Even if you didn't the first thing that would go into the Exynos DRM > driver tree after this is merged is a rename patch anyway. > > Thierry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
