Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>
Hi :-)
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:45:59 +0200, Sergei Shtylyov
> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 28-09-2010 5:31, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >
> >> From: Changhwan Youn
> >
> >> It is reported by Junseok Jung that using clz instruction is
> >> better instead of using for-loop t
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
Hi ;-)
> On 28-09-2010 5:31, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> > From: Changhwan Youn
>
> > It is reported by Junseok Jung that using clz instruction is
> > better instead of using for-loop to find the interrupt source.
> > This patch modifies interrupt source searching
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:45:59 +0200, Sergei Shtylyov
wrote:
Hello.
On 28-09-2010 5:31, Kukjin Kim wrote:
From: Changhwan Youn
It is reported by Junseok Jung that using clz instruction is
better instead of using for-loop to find the interrupt source.
This patch modifies interrupt source se
Hello.
On 28-09-2010 5:31, Kukjin Kim wrote:
From: Changhwan Youn
It is reported by Junseok Jung that using clz instruction is
better instead of using for-loop to find the interrupt source.
This patch modifies interrupt source searching code using __fls().
The __fls() is implemented using cl
From: Changhwan Youn
It is reported by Junseok Jung that using clz instruction is
better instead of using for-loop to find the interrupt source.
This patch modifies interrupt source searching code using __fls().
The __fls() is implemented using clz instruction.
Suggested-by: Junseok Jung
Signed