On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:52:06PM +0530, Giridhar Maruthy wrote:
> Using 256fs or 512fs will result in distortion of 24-bit
> audio samples. This is because the lrclk generated is not
> proper. Using 384 fs generates proper output.
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Giridhar Maruthy
wrote:
> Using 256fs or 512fs will result in distortion of 24-bit
> audio samples. This is because the lrclk generated is not
> proper. Using 384 fs generates proper output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy
> ---
> sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm899
It works fine with this change.
On 13 July 2011 16:52, Giridhar Maruthy wrote:
> Using 256fs or 512fs will result in distortion of 24-bit
> audio samples. This is because the lrclk generated is not
> proper. Using 384 fs generates proper output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy
> ---
> sound
Using 256fs or 512fs will result in distortion of 24-bit
audio samples. This is because the lrclk generated is not
proper. Using 384 fs generates proper output.
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy
---
sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
dif