From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.c...@samsung.com>

When pm handler set freq & voltage, frequency mismatch occurred.
Because freqs.new isn't set in pm handler.

Reported-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesa...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.c...@samsung.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 6d6ba0d..48ee439 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -69,9 +69,10 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
        int ret = 0;
 
        freqs.old = policy->cur;
+       freqs.new = target_freq;
        freqs.cpu = policy->cpu;
 
-       if (target_freq == freqs.old)
+       if (freqs.new == freqs.old)
                goto out;
 
        /*
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
        unsigned int index;
+       unsigned int new_freq;
        int ret = 0;
 
        mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -172,9 +174,9 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                goto out;
        }
 
-       freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+       new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
 
-       ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freqs.new);
+       ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq);
 
 out:
        mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to