On 2014년 05월 22일 14:25, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Hi Inki,
>
> The below fix doesn't affect the FB dev buffer allocation. IMO the scenario
> where u-boot allocates the buffer is not disturbed.
> Please review the implementation.
>
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Regards,
> Rahul Sharma.
>
> On 7 May
Thanks Sachin.
On 22 May 2014 11:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> From: Rahul Sharma
>>
>> Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled.
>> Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently
>> fail for large
Hi Rahul,
On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> From: Rahul Sharma
>
> Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled.
> Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently
> fail for large buffers and then fall back to non contigous. Apart
> from being slow,
Hi Inki,
The below fix doesn't affect the FB dev buffer allocation. IMO the scenario
where u-boot allocates the buffer is not disturbed.
Please review the implementation.
Regards,
Rahul Sharma.
On 7 May 2014 17:21, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> From: Rahul Sharma
>
> Allow to allocate non-contigous bu
From: Rahul Sharma
Allow to allocate non-contigous buffers when iommu is enabled.
Currently, it tries to allocates contigous buffer which consistently
fail for large buffers and then fall back to non contigous. Apart
from being slow, this implementation is also very noisy and fills
the screen wit