Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: register driver early in subsys initcall to avoid probe defer

2015-11-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
Hi Marek, > This problem is known for ages, there were number of attempts to add Yes, I heard of it, too. > support for deferred probe or solve the problem of deferred UDC driver > probe, but none got accepted so far: Then they need to be worked on. AFAIK the rejection is based on implementatio

Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: register driver early in subsys initcall to avoid probe defer

2015-11-19 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2015-11-01 17:02, Wolfram Sang wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:23:28PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: i2c bus drivers should be registered earlier than typical drivers to let important i2c devices (like PMICs/regulators) get registered early enough to avoid probe defer of all device

Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: register driver early in subsys initcall to avoid probe defer

2015-11-01 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:23:28PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > i2c bus drivers should be registered earlier than typical drivers to let > important i2c devices (like PMICs/regulators) get registered early > enough to avoid probe defer of all devices in typical embedded system. > > Signed-off-

[PATCH] i2c: exynos5: register driver early in subsys initcall to avoid probe defer

2015-10-30 Thread Marek Szyprowski
i2c bus drivers should be registered earlier than typical drivers to let important i2c devices (like PMICs/regulators) get registered early enough to avoid probe defer of all devices in typical embedded system. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 +++