* Grant Likely | 2013-07-24 15:19:58 [+0100]:
Was there more breakage than imx6 and amba devices? Your first version
had a fallback case for powerpc. Couldn't we do just allow that for more
than just powerpc? I'd much rather see some work-around within the core
DT code with a warning to
On 07/29/2013 04:33 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:44 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
BTW, it looks like Grant has attempted this already:
Yup, things broke badly. Unfortunately the of_platform_device and
platform_device history doesn't treat resources in the same way.
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 20:14 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The problem is that platform_device_del() releases each ressource in its
tree. This does not work on platform_devices created by OF becuase they
were never added via insert_resource(). As a consequence old-parent in
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:44 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
BTW, it looks like Grant has attempted this already:
Yup, things broke badly. Unfortunately the of_platform_device and
platform_device history doesn't treat resources in the same way. I
would like to merge the code, but I haven't been
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:16:07 -0500, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 06:44 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 07/20/2013 07:42 AM, NAVEEN KRISHNA CHATRADHI wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
Hello Naveen,
I just did one more testing.
In case of iio/adc/exynos_adc.c there is a bug in the remove path.
If I fix the bug in the driver, with below patch
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
+++
Hello Sebastian,
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Sebastian Andrzej Siewiorbige...@linutronix.de
Date : Jul 22, 2013 13:55 (GMT+05:30)
Title : Re: [PATCH] of: provide of_platform_unpopulate()
On 07/20/2013 07:42 AM, NAVEEN KRISHNA CHATRADHI wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
Hello Naveen
On 07/21/2013 06:44 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a quick grep
I did what others did as well and rmmod ended in:
| Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a quick grep
I did what others did as well and rmmod ended in:
| Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0018
| PC is at
Hello Sebastian,
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Sebastian Andrzej Siewiorbige...@linutronix.de
Date : Jul 19, 2013 23:44 (GMT+05:30)
Title : [PATCH] of: provide of_platform_unpopulate()
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
probed and on rmmod
, I could configure it as a module and the rmmod, insmod
are working fine. (no crash)
Regards,
Naveen
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Sebastian Andrzej Siewiorbige...@linutronix.de
Date : Jul 19, 2013 23:44 (GMT+05:30)
Title : [PATCH] of: provide of_platform_unpopulate()
So I called
13 matches
Mail list logo
