On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 7:18 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 04/11/14 04:18, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> > 2: Since PM domain relies on PMU registers and does not have its own
>> > DT binding, MFD client and MFD device is most suitable
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 7:18 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 04/11/14 04:18, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > 2: Since PM domain relies on PMU registers and does not have its own
> > DT binding, MFD client and MFD device is most suitable for making
> > this kind of platform drivers.
>
> We hav
On 04/11/14 04:18, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> 2: Since PM domain relies on PMU registers and does not have
> its own DT binding, MFD client and MFD device
> is most suitable for making this kind of platform drivers.
We have DT binding for the Exynos power domains:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> On Monday, November 03, 2014 8:56 PM, Lee Jones wrote,
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] drivers: mfd: Add support for Exynos PMU driver
> >
> > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >
> > > From: Pankaj
Hi Lee,
On Monday, November 03, 2014 8:56 PM, Lee Jones wrote,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] drivers: mfd: Add support for Exynos PMU driver
>
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>
> > From: Pankaj Dubey
> >
> > This patch moves Exynos PMU driver
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> From: Pankaj Dubey
>
> This patch moves Exynos PMU driver implementation from "arm/mach-exynos"
> to "drivers/mfd". This driver is mainly used for setting misc bits of
> register from PMU IP of Exynos SoC which will be required to configure
> bef
From: Pankaj Dubey
This patch moves Exynos PMU driver implementation from "arm/mach-exynos"
to "drivers/mfd". This driver is mainly used for setting misc bits of
register from PMU IP of Exynos SoC which will be required to configure
before Suspend/Resume. Currently all these settings are done in
