Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-02-03 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37:19AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ajay Kumar wrote: > > Currently, third party bridge drivers(ptn3460) are dependent > > on the corresponding encoder driver init, since bridge driver > > needs a drm_device pointer to finish drm initializ

Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-02-02 Thread Ajay kumar
Hi, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37:19AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ajay Kumar >> wrote: >> I'll also need to update the new bridge in the msm edp code.. >> although that isn't such a big deal if

Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-02-02 Thread Ajay kumar
Hi Rob, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ajay Kumar wrote: >> Currently, third party bridge drivers(ptn3460) are dependent >> on the corresponding encoder driver init, since bridge driver >> needs a drm_device pointer to finish drm initializat

Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-01-30 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 30 January 2015 at 15:37, Rob Clark wrote: > ok, so I probably should have had a closer look at this before it > landed in drm-next, so if it is too late to revert (and deal w/ > untangling subsequent patches that depend on this) some of these > issues we'll just have to fix with follow-on

Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-01-30 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37:19AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ajay Kumar wrote: > I'll also need to update the new bridge in the msm edp code.. > although that isn't such a big deal if I knew how this was *supposed* > to work.. since what is there now at least does

Re: [PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-01-30 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Ajay Kumar wrote: > Currently, third party bridge drivers(ptn3460) are dependent > on the corresponding encoder driver init, since bridge driver > needs a drm_device pointer to finish drm initializations. > The encoder driver passes the drm_device pointer to the >

[PATCH 03/14] drm/bridge: make bridge registration independent of drm flow

2015-01-20 Thread Ajay Kumar
Currently, third party bridge drivers(ptn3460) are dependent on the corresponding encoder driver init, since bridge driver needs a drm_device pointer to finish drm initializations. The encoder driver passes the drm_device pointer to the bridge driver. Because of this dependency, third party drivers