On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 06:24:07AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Hmm, Mr Park and Co really need to learn how to handle the treatment of
> patches. I'm really disapointed that these patches get submitted without
> the proper authour accreditation. If this isn't sorted out then I for
> one will start t
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:29:38AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> >
>> > Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
>> > dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
>> > Kcon
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:29:38AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >
> > Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
> > dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
> > Kconfig (and updating it again when support for the new SoC v
Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>
> Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
> dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
> Kconfig (and updating it again when support for the new SoC variant is
> added).
>
Hi, Marek
Kyungmin Park already submitted same
Most Samsung SoC have support for SDHCI block, so make the driver
dependent on the Samsung platform instead on listing all SoCs in the
Kconfig (and updating it again when support for the new SoC variant is
added).
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/mmc/host
