Hi Olof,
On 28 August 2014 09:26, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:14:18PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
>> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
>
> Uh, no -- it just adds the dtsi.
Ok. Will
Hi Tomasz,
On 27 August 2014 17:00, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> On 27.08.2014 11:44, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
>> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen
Hi Mark,
On 27 August 2014 16:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:18AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
>> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
>
> Fallout from a rebase? That latter par
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:47:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> >> Ok. If address-cells is kept at 2 the unit address needs to be changed
> >> >> to "0,0". So one or the other has to be changed.
> >> >
> >> > I'm happy e
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> >> > + cpus {
>>> >> > + #ad
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> >> Ok. If address-cells is kept at 2 the unit address needs to be changed
>> >> to "0,0". So one or the other has to be changed.
>> >
>> > I'm happy either way.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure the rest of the tree had "0," prefixes on all of
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:37:19PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/08/14 18:30, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>
> >>> From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> >> From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Mark Rutland
> >> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >> > + cpus {
> >> >> > +
On 28/08/14 18:30, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>>> From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Mark Rutland
>>> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41:03 +0100
>>> Subjec
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
>> From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Mark Rutland
>> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41:03 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] Doc: dt: arch_timer: discourage clock-frequ
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Mark Rutland
> > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41:03 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Doc: dt: arch_timer: discourage
On 28/08/14 18:03, Mark Rutland wrote:
> From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41:03 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Doc: dt: arch_timer: discourage clock-frequency use
>
> The ARM Generic Timer (AKA the architected timer
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >> > + cpus {
>> >> > + #address-cells = <2>;
>> >> > + #size-cells = <0>;
>> >>
>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> > + cpus {
> >> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>
> >> Why size-cells=2? Can you not fit a cpuid in 32 bits?
> >
>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > + cpus {
>> > + #address-cells = <2>;
>> > + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> Why size-cells=2? Can you not fit a cpuid in 32 bits?
>
> As of commit 72aea393a2e7 (arm64: smp: honour #address-size when parsing
> CPU reg
Hi,
> > + cpus {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> Why size-cells=2? Can you not fit a cpuid in 32 bits?
As of commit 72aea393a2e7 (arm64: smp: honour #address-size when parsing
CPU reg property) Linux can handle single-cell cpu node reg entries
where
On 28/08/14 04:56, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:14:18PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
>> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
>
> Uh, no -- it just adds the dtsi.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nave
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:14:18PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
Uh, no -- it just adds the dtsi.
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
> Cc: Thomas Abraham
> Cc: Rob He
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:42:31AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:18AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> > + cpus {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + cpu@0 {
> > +
Hi Naveen,
Please see my comments inline.
On 27.08.2014 11:44, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
> Cc: Thomas Abraham
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: C
Hi Naveen,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:18AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
> Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
Fallout from a rebase? That latter part doesn't seem to be relevant.
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Ch
Add initial device tree nodes for EXYNOS7 SoC.
Also, includes the dt-binding definitions for clock ids.
Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
Cc: Thomas Abraham
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Catalin Marinas
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos7.dtsi | 553 ++
1 file cha
25 matches
Mail list logo
