Hi Tushar,
On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 10:20:14 Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 10:20 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> > On 06/11/2013 12:23 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> On Monday 10 of June 2013 09:13:11 Tushar Behera wrote:
> >>> On 06/08/2013 05:20 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 06 of
On 06/17/2013 10:20 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 12:23 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Monday 10 of June 2013 09:13:11 Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2013 05:20 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:52:28 Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> MUX_A(mout_core,
On 06/11/2013 12:23 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Monday 10 of June 2013 09:13:11 Tushar Behera wrote:
>> On 06/08/2013 05:20 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:52:28 Tushar Behera wrote:
[ ... ]
MUX_A(mout_core, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210,
-
On Monday 10 of June 2013 09:13:11 Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 05:20 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:52:28 Tushar Behera wrote:
> >> cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4 based SoCs are not platform drivers, hence
> >> we cannot currently pass the clock names through a devic
On 06/08/2013 05:20 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:52:28 Tushar Behera wrote:
>> cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4 based SoCs are not platform drivers, hence
>> we cannot currently pass the clock names through a device tree node.
>> Instead, we need to make them available through
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 16:52:28 Tushar Behera wrote:
> cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4 based SoCs are not platform drivers, hence
> we cannot currently pass the clock names through a device tree node.
> Instead, we need to make them available through a global alias.
>
> 'armclk', 'moutcore', 'mout
cpufreq driver for EXYNOS4 based SoCs are not platform drivers, hence
we cannot currently pass the clock names through a device tree node.
Instead, we need to make them available through a global alias.
'armclk', 'moutcore', 'mout_mpll' and 'mout_apll' clock aliases are
defined.
Signed-off-by: Tu
