Inki Dae wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
Yes, of course.
We will fix it soon. For this, I mentioned earlier,
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/hhSc574WhqJAKgdBq7KL
Thanks,
Inki Dae
Hello,
it looks like libdrm git master is still using the EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ioctl
that was removed by this patch.
On 2014년 11월 19일 07:09, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Inki Dae wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
Yes, of course.
We will fix it soon. For this, I mentioned earlier,
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/hhSc574WhqJAKgdBq7KL
Thanks,
Inki Dae
Hello,
it looks like libdrm git master is still using the
Inki Dae wrote:
Hello,
it looks like libdrm git master is still using the EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ioctl
that was removed by this patch. Is there any news on the patches for libdrm?
The patch set already was posted. You can refer to below link,
On 2014년 10월 01일 22:17, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Inki,
On 17.09.2014 15:48, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch removes DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ictrl feature specific
to Exynos drm and instead uses drm generic mmap.
It looks like libdrm_exynos is still using DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP, but this
patch just
Hi Inki,
On 17.09.2014 15:48, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch removes DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ictrl feature specific
to Exynos drm and instead uses drm generic mmap.
It looks like libdrm_exynos is still using DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP, but this
patch just removes it. This basically means that any application
Hi,
On 09/17/2014 10:48 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch removes DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ictrl feature specific
to Exynos drm and instead uses drm generic mmap.
We had used the interface specific to Exynos drm to do mmap directly,
not to use demand paging which maps each page with physical memory
Thanks for review.
Below trivial things you pointed out will be fixed soon.
On 2014년 09월 18일 13:56, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
Hi,
On 09/17/2014 10:48 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch removes DRM_EXYNOS_GEM_MMAP ictrl feature specific
to Exynos drm and instead uses drm generic mmap.
We had
