On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> > Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> >>
>> >> NAK.
>> >>
>> > I don't know why I need your ack for this...if any opinions, just
> comments
>> > is enough.
>>
>> Okay I said
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Kyungmin Park wrote:
> >>
> >> NAK.
> >>
> > I don't know why I need your ack for this...if any opinions, just
comments
> > is enough.
>
> Okay I said in other word, I can't agree this patch.
>
> >
> >> This approac
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>> NAK.
>>
> I don't know why I need your ack for this...if any opinions, just comments
> is enough.
Okay I said in other word, I can't agree this patch.
>
>> This approach don't make a common GPIO framework. I already
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> NAK.
>
I don't know why I need your ack for this...if any opinions, just comments
is enough.
> This approach don't make a common GPIO framework. I already send the
> common GPIO framework which send the base address to GPIO framework
> and handle it regradless GPIO is on
NAK.
This approach don't make a common GPIO framework. I already send the
common GPIO framework which send the base address to GPIO framework
and handle it regradless GPIO is one or three.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-August/022513.html
With this patch, we can use t
From: Jongpill Lee
This patch adds initial map for GPIO2 and GPIO3.
S5PV310/S5PC210 has separated GPIO1, GPIO2 and GPIO3.
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv310/cpu.c | 10 ++
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/map-s5p.h |2 ++
2
