Saves a tiny amount of code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c | 43 +--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c
b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c
index adf1765..5f7d57
Hi,
On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> Saves a tiny amount of code.
How so?
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c | 43 +--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sh
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:37:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Saves a tiny amount of code.
> How so?
It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're
right it doesn't achieve anything (except avoiding redundancy o
On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:37:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Saves a tiny amount of code.
>
> > How so?
>
> It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're
> > right it doesn't achieve anything (except avoiding redundancy once 1/3
> > gets applied I guess).
>
On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, December 02, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > It saves source code size when we get the second user, by itself you're
> > > right it doesn't achieve anything (except
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code,
> > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific implementation and using
> > the generic code instead.
>
On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code,
> > > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific