On 02/19/14 05:00, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Stultzjohn.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmanna...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 08:16:13 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kukjin
On 02/21/14 03:58, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:09:59PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Catalin Marinas
Two additional points:
1. Single arm64 defconfig file covering everything
2. Modules rather than built-in by default where possible
On 02/20/14 18:03, Olof Johansson wrote:
[...]
I.e. I'd be OK with an
ARCH_EXYNOS/ARCH_TEGRA/ARCH_IMX/ARCH_whatever, but I don't think we
should add more finegrained options than that globally on ARM64, at
least not until truly proven to be needed. We're trying to push back
against new per-SoC
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:06 PM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:03:30AM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
So, after giving this some more thought (and getting my hands dirty in
some of this code), I think I'm going to change my mind on this. For
mobile platforms I think it might make sense to bring over the
toplevel platform Kconfig
On Thursday 20 February 2014 11:22:48 Catalin Marinas wrote:
I'm fine with this. Do we still need something for ARMv8 server
platforms like ARCH_ARM_SBSA? The only advantage would be to make it
easier for mobile targeted kernel builds to disable server features but
I'm not sure there are so
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Catalin Marinas
catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:03:30AM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
So, after giving this some more thought (and getting my hands dirty in
some of this code), I think I'm going to change my mind on this. For
mobile
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 05:09:59PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Catalin Marinas
Two additional points:
1. Single arm64 defconfig file covering everything
2. Modules rather than built-in by default where possible (especially
for server platforms)
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 10:10:30 Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 02/15/14 02:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/15/14 02:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com
wrote:
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:10:30AM +, Kukjin Kim wrote:
As I commented above, how about MCT? Samsung has a plan to use MCT on
ARMv8, it is not for used for GH7 though...
Any reason for not using the generic timer?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 08:16:13 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/15/14 02:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
My feeling is that we don't need to use the levels for Kconfig, although
we might want to use them DT compatible
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 08:16:13 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/15/14 02:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
My feeling is that we don't need to use the levels
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 08:16:13 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/15/14
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 08:16:13 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17,
On 02/15/14 02:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
Basically, I agreed with
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
Basically, I agreed with Arnd's suggestion to use ARCH_SBSA. Or we
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Catalin Marinascatalin.mari...@arm.com
wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: Catalin Marinas
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig.
Signed-off-by:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:39:27PM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon,
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared between arm and
arm64 that depend on
On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Catalin Marinascatalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Galaga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
The overhead of building one more device tree isn't very large,
This patch adds support for Samsung GH7 SoC in arm64/Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig |5 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile |1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
26 matches
Mail list logo
