Kyungmin Park wrote:
On 2/1/12, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
[snip]
+static int exynos5_clk_gate_block(struct clk *clk, int enable)
exynos5_clk_block_ctrl?
OK, looks better, will change.
[snip]
+ .name = mfc,
+ .devname= s3c-mfc,
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos5.c | 1258
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 62 ++
arch/arm/plat-s5p/clock.c | 36 +
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s5p-clock.h |
On 2/1/12, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock-exynos5.c | 1258
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-clock.h | 62 ++
Doesn't it better split the three header files?
