On 01/12/10 11:55, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:44:25PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> This makes all the functions that use the shift slightly smaller, one
>>> instruction in most cases but more for ack() and maskack().
>
>> Uhm...I'm not sure to use chip_d
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:44:25PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This makes all the functions that use the shift slightly smaller, one
> > > instruction in most cases but more for ack() and maskack().
>
> > Uhm...I'm not sure to use chip_data for th
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 08:44:25PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > This makes all the functions that use the shift slightly smaller, one
> > instruction in most cases but more for ack() and maskack().
> Uhm...I'm not sure to use chip_data for the eint_irq_to_bit() is best to us.
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> This makes all the functions that use the shift slightly smaller, one
> instruction in most cases but more for ack() and maskack().
>
Hi Mark,
Uhm...I'm not sure to use chip_data for the eint_irq_to_bit() is best to us.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim , Senior
This makes all the functions that use the shift slightly smaller, one
instruction in most cases but more for ack() and maskack().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/irq-eint.c |9 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/
