On Thursday 09 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park
> > wrote:
> > > > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?
> > >
> > > For a
Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park
> wrote:
> > > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?
> >
> > For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?
>
> For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add
> device-tree enabled boards.
A
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?
For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add
device-tree enabled boards.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?
On 2/1/12, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 11
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile|2 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk5250.c | 94
>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 11
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile|2 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk5250.c | 94 ++
3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exyno
