Hello Lee,
On 01/20/2015 08:48 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> Looks okay to me, but I'd be happy with some more reviews from the
> Chrome guys. I would especially like some knowledgeable type to
> answer your EC_PROTO2_MAX_PARAM_SIZE question. If no one does, I
> guess it can always be changed later.
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The struct cros_ec_command will be used as an ioctl() argument for the
> API to control the ChromeOS EC from user-space. So the data structure
> has to be 64-bit safe to make it compatible between 32 and 64 avoiding
> the need for a compat ioc
The struct cros_ec_command will be used as an ioctl() argument for the
API to control the ChromeOS EC from user-space. So the data structure
has to be 64-bit safe to make it compatible between 32 and 64 avoiding
the need for a compat ioctl interface. Since pointers are self-aligned
to different byt
