Hi Mark,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:20:36AM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
>> Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a
>> platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there
>> was no separate ha
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:20:36AM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
> Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a
> platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there
> was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a
> virtual dev
Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a
platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there
was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a
virtual device with sole purpose to call snd_soc_register_platform().
This change re
