2014-04-08 0:40 GMT+09:00, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com:
On 07.04.2014 17:16, Inki Dae wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com:
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
The code creating the list of components to wait
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
The code creating the list of components to wait for
(exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
actually enabled in kernel config.
Are you sure?
exynos_drm_add_components() will try to
Hi Andrzej,
On 07.04.2014 16:18, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
The code creating the list of components to wait for
(exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
actually enabled in kernel config.
Are
Hi Andrzej,
2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com:
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
The code creating the list of components to wait for
(exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which sub-drivers are
actually enabled in
On 07.04.2014 17:16, Inki Dae wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
2014-04-07 23:18 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda a.ha...@samsung.com:
Hi Inki and Tomasz,
On 04/06/2014 05:15 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
(...)
The code creating the list of components to wait for
(exynos_drm_add_components()) doesn't seem to consider which
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 01:21:24PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
As you may know, there is exynos chip that has two display
controllers. So it is possible to compose display pipe lines at same
time like below,
fimd0-bridges..--Panel
fimd1-maybe bridges..-CPU Panel
How we can
Hi Russell,
2014-04-06 17:47 GMT+09:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 01:21:24PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
As you may know, there is exynos chip that has two display
controllers. So it is possible to compose display pipe lines at same
time like below,
[adding more people and MLs on Cc for further discussion]
On 04.04.2014 17:44, Inki Dae wrote:
2014-04-04 22:55 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com:
Hi Inki,
On 01.04.2014 14:37, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch adds super device support to bind sub drivers
using device tree.
For this, you
On 05.04.2014 20:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Not exactly. The approach we found does mostly the same as componentized
subsystem framework but without _any_ extra data in Device Tree. Just
based on the list of subsystem
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
to the same extent as componentized subsystem framework, at least in
Exynos case.
On 05.04.2014 20:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Maybe my words have been misinterpreted, but all I'm suggesting here is
that there is no need to add any new data to DT to solve the same issue
to the same extent as componentized
I'd be really happy if you gave me such opinions before pull request.
Anyway, below is my comments.
2014-04-06 2:32 GMT+09:00 Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com:
[adding more people and MLs on Cc for further discussion]
On 04.04.2014 17:44, Inki Dae wrote:
2014-04-04 22:55 GMT+09:00 Tomasz
2014-04-06 3:31 GMT+09:00, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com:
On 05.04.2014 20:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Not exactly. The approach we found does mostly the same as componentized
subsystem framework but without _any_ extra
13 matches
Mail list logo
