Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-18 Thread MyungJoo Ham
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: >  Op 16-07-10 10:01, MyungJoo Ham schreef: >> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. >> >> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not >> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in >> this version. >>

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-16 Thread Maurus Cuelenaere
Op 16-07-10 10:01, MyungJoo Ham schreef: > S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. > > This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not > as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in > this version. > > Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC,

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:01:17PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. > > This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not > as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in > this version. Especially in terms of the regulator API usage:

[PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-16 Thread MyungJoo Ham
S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in this version. Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating cl