On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
>> values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
>> had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
>>
On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
those shift and mask values as well, we'd better define them at a
Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
those shift and mask values as well, we'd better define them at a single
location, whose proper location wo