Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-20 Thread MyungJoo Ham
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> >> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. >> >> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not >> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in >> this version. >> >> Note that CLK_SRC of so

RE: [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-19 Thread Kukjin Kim
MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. > > This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not > as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in > this version. > > Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC, > and ONEDRAM ar

Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:31:23PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. > > This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not > as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in > this version. > > Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including

[PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: S5PV210: Initial CPUFREQ Support

2010-07-18 Thread MyungJoo Ham
S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support. This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in this version. Note that CLK_SRC of some clocks including ARMCLK, G3D, G2D, MFC, and ONEDRAM are modified directly without updating cl