Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: l2x0/pl310: Refactor Kconfig to be more maintainable

2011-12-17 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Dave Martin wrote: > Making CACHE_L2X0 depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) > is bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts. > > This patch moves the knowledge of which platforms have a L2x0 or > PL310 cache controller to the individua

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: l2x0/pl310: Refactor Kconfig to be more maintainable

2011-12-16 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:53:50PM +, Dave Martin wrote: > Making CACHE_L2X0 depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) > is bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts. > > This patch moves the knowledge of which platforms have a L2x0 or > PL310 cache controller to the

[PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: l2x0/pl310: Refactor Kconfig to be more maintainable

2011-12-15 Thread Dave Martin
Making CACHE_L2X0 depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) is bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts. This patch moves the knowledge of which platforms have a L2x0 or PL310 cache controller to the individual machines. To enable this, a new MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 confi