Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers

2010-08-09 Thread MyungJoo Ham
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> >>       The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We >> define physical addresses and mapping between physical and virtual >> addresses of DMCx registers. >> >> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers

2010-08-04 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> >>       The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We >> define physical addresses and mapping between physical and virtual >> addresses of DMCx registers. >> >> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham >> Signed-off-by:

RE: [PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers

2010-08-04 Thread Kukjin Kim
MyungJoo Ham wrote: > > The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We > define physical addresses and mapping between physical and virtual > addresses of DMCx registers. > > Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c

[PATCH v6 5/7] ARM: S5PV210: Access for DMCx registers

2010-08-03 Thread MyungJoo Ham
The CPUFREQ driver requires an access to DMCx registers. We define physical addresses and mapping between physical and virtual addresses of DMCx registers. Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c | 12 +++- arch/arm