On Wed 2014-08-27 12:11:55, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 07:19 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Would you elaborate?
If I have a device like a phone, I may want to put one slot inside
phone for basic system, and offer second slot for user expansion
(initially empty).
if
Hi!
Would you elaborate?
If I have a device like a phone, I may want to put one slot inside
phone for basic system, and offer second slot for user expansion
(initially empty).
if multiple slot is supported, then a mmcqd should be processing for
multiple slots.
It's too
Hi,
On 08/26/2014 07:19 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Would you elaborate?
If I have a device like a phone, I may want to put one slot inside
phone for basic system, and offer second slot for user expansion
(initially empty).
if multiple slot is supported, then a mmcqd should be
On Thu 2014-08-07 16:37:57, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So we can remove the sub-node, because almost SoC used the only one card per
a host.
And supports-highspeed can be replaced with cap-mmc/sd-highspeed
property.
Would it be better to fix
On 08/25/2014 08:21 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2014-08-07 16:37:57, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So we can remove the sub-node, because almost SoC used the only one card per
a host.
And supports-highspeed can be replaced with
On Mon 2014-08-25 20:28:21, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 08/25/2014 08:21 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2014-08-07 16:37:57, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So we can remove the sub-node, because almost SoC used the only one card
per a host.
On 08/25/2014 08:37 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2014-08-25 20:28:21, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 08/25/2014 08:21 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2014-08-07 16:37:57, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So we can remove the sub-node, because almost SoC
On 08/25/2014 09:09 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 08/25/2014 08:37 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2014-08-25 20:28:21, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 08/25/2014 08:21 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2014-08-07 16:37:57, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So
Since used the mmc_of_parse(), didn't parse the sub-node.
So we can remove the sub-node, because almost SoC used the only one card per a
host.
And supports-highspeed can be replaced with cap-mmc/sd-highspeed property.
Changelog V10:
- Rebased for next.
- Remove conflict
Changelog
