Hi,
> > At the moment perhaps the strongest argument for why this particular
> > arbitration scheme is needed is that's what the EC (embedded
> > controller) on the ARM Chromebook uses. There have been several
> > arguments in-house about whether this was the most ideal way to
> > structure thing
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Wolfram,
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:33:15PM +0530, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
>>> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
>>> being discussing in the mai
Wolfram,
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:33:15PM +0530, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
>> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
>> being discussing in the mainline.
>> This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:33:15PM +0530, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
> being discussing in the mainline.
> This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus arbitration
> and to have the arbitration parameters.
I still haven'
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Yavaraj,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D
>>> wrote:
This RFC patch is w.r.t multimast
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Yavaraj,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
>>> being discussing in the main
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Yavaraj,
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D
> wrote:
>>
>> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
>> being discussing in the mainline.
>> This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus a
Yavaraj,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
>
> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
> being discussing in the mainline.
> This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus arbitration
> and to have the arbitration parameters.
I may have
Below are the links on multi master bus arbitration where it has been
discussing.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1410276
http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=179505&p=2
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which
This RFC patch is w.r.t multimaster bus arbitration which is already
being discussing in the mainline.
This patch provides hooks for the i2c multimaster bus arbitration
and to have the arbitration parameters.
Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 13 -
inclu
10 matches
Mail list logo
