Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-26 Thread YoungJun Cho
Hi Andrzej, On 04/24/2014 10:23 AM, YoungJun Cho wrote: Hi Andrzej, Thank you for comments. On 04/23/2014 05:29 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different from the one in Exynos4 SoC. In case of

Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-23 Thread Andrzej Hajda
On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different from the one in Exynos4 SoC. In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in DSIM_PLLCTRL_REG, and it uses DSIM_PHYCTRL_REG and DSIM_PHYTIMING*_REG instead. So this

Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-23 Thread YoungJun Cho
Hi Andrzej, Thank you for comments. On 04/23/2014 05:29 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 04/21/2014 02:28 PM, YoungJun Cho wrote: The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different from the one in Exynos4 SoC. In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in

[RFC v2 PATCH 08/14] drm/exynos: dsi: add driver data to support Exynos5420

2014-04-21 Thread YoungJun Cho
The offset of register DSIM_PLLTMR_REG in Exynos5420 is different from the one in Exynos4 SoC. In case of Exynos5420 SoC, there is no frequency band bit in DSIM_PLLCTRL_REG, and it uses DSIM_PHYCTRL_REG and DSIM_PHYTIMING*_REG instead. So this patch adds driver data to distinguish it.