On Thu, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Though if then everything works fine with system and internal DMA,
> maybe it is better to assign platform_name string at runtime from some
> module parameter, and leaving the default to normal system DMA ?
OK, I will leaving the default to syste
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:42:27PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mark Brown
>
>> > If iDMA is always a better choice on CPUs that support it then the
>> > cpu_is_() macros might be a good way to make the selection?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:42:27PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mark Brown
> > If iDMA is always a better choice on CPUs that support it then the
> > cpu_is_() macros might be a good way to make the selection?
> Actually I remembered just after I posted - iDMA would
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56:45PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim wrote:
>
>> > I only focused on S5PV210 and S5PV310.
>> > I didn't consider s3c and s5p series.
>> > In the next version, I will delet
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:56:45PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim wrote:
> > I only focused on S5PV210 and S5PV310.
> > I didn't consider s3c and s5p series.
> > In the next version, I will delete it.
> Though if then everything works fine with system a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Sangbeom Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> NAK.
>> It will break the most common user - SMDK6410, as s3c6410 doesn't have any
>> I2S internal DMA.
>> Please try to test the changes before submitting. I know it's boring,
>> but it's
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> NAK.
> It will break the most common user - SMDK6410, as s3c6410 doesn't have any
> I2S internal DMA.
> Please try to test the changes before submitting. I know it's boring,
> but it's even more important :)
>
> Thanks
I only focused on S5PV210
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:47PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> When you resubmit for the API change update it'd be helpful to update
> the changelog to explain why the platforms are being changed to use only
> internal DMA - what is the advantage this offers over regular DMA? This
> will help users
