On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
>> One reason i doubt why it could be coming is because we are
>> specifically putting the
>> child after doing everything with it.
>>
>> When we are getting the child node using for_each
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
>> One reason i doubt why it could be coming is because we are
>> specifically putting the
>> child after doing everything with it.
>>
>> When we are getting the child node using for_each
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> One reason i doubt why it could be coming is because we are
> specifically putting the
> child after doing everything with it.
>
> When we are getting the child node using for_each_available_child_of_node(),
> which calls for of_get_next_avail
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
it's always good to keep the relevant mailing list also in CC (linux-usb).
Also added Alan here.
>
> Booting 3.17-rc6 on ODROID-U2, I see this message:
>
> ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /ehci@1258/port@1
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Co
Hi,
Booting 3.17-rc6 on ODROID-U2, I see this message:
ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /ehci@1258/port@1
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.17.0-rc6-00376-g85cd8fd #1031
[] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x84/0xc4)
[] (dump_stack) fr
