On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > >> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
> > >>
On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
> >> better, i.e. 3.11.
> >>
> I think, this would be better choice for now if i
On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
better, i.e. 3.11.
I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not urgent...
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
> better, i.e. 3.11.
>
> First, the defconfig we have in our out-of-tree build system now
> builds a broken kernel since it doesn't set ARCH_EXYNOS_SINGLE. As a
> result, exyno
Arnd,
I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
better, i.e. 3.11.
First, the defconfig we have in our out-of-tree build system now
builds a broken kernel since it doesn't set ARCH_EXYNOS_SINGLE. As a
result, exynos gets turned off. It's quite awkward to switch between
