Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-31 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 30 January 2013 15:18, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Sachin Kamat wrote: >> This patch is required along with the >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos a

Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-30 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Linus, On 30 January 2013 15:18, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> >>> >> This patch is required along with the >>> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" >>> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51

Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> >> This patch is required along with the >> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" >> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into >> >> mainline. Without the missi

Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-29 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 30 January 2013 09:38, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> >> This patch is required along with the >> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" >> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into >> >> mainline. Without the missing patc

RE: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-29 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sachin Kamat wrote: > > >> This patch is required along with the > >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" > >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into > >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up > >> warnings and su

Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-29 Thread Sachin Kamat
>> This patch is required along with the >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on

Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Patch titled "pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option" > (linux-next commit Id: 7452b64d) which is present in linux-next is > missing in the mainline kernel. Do I haven't sent my pull request for the pinctrl fixes yet. > This patch is

RE: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-28 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Linus, Kukjin, > > Patch titled "pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option" > (linux-next commit Id: 7452b64d) which is present in linux-next is > missing in the mainline kernel. This patch is required along with the > patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for

Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

2013-01-28 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Linus, Kukjin, Patch titled "pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option" (linux-next commit Id: 7452b64d) which is present in linux-next is missing in the mainline kernel. This patch is required along with the patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440" (mainline c