On 11/27/12 17:50, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 27 November 2012 10:31, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote:
With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt support
for dwmci controller can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
---
On 27 November 2012 10:31, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Monday, November 26, 2012, Thomas Abraham
> wrote:
>> With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
>> support
>> for dwmci controller can be removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-ex
Hi Mr. Park,
On 26 November 2012 16:57, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
>> support
>> for dwmci controller can be removed.
>
> Are there no problem to use legacy board? e.g., universal_c210.
Th
On Monday, November 26, 2012, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
> support
> for dwmci controller can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile |1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/d
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> > With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
> > support
> > for dwmci controller can be removed.
>
> Are there no problem to use legacy board? e.g., universal_c210.
>
I cannot find anywhere the exynos4_
Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
> support
> for dwmci controller can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile |1 -
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-dwmci.c | 75
--
On 11/26/12, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> With device tree support enabled for dwmci controller, the unused non-dt
> support
> for dwmci controller can be removed.
Are there no problem to use legacy board? e.g., universal_c210.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
