On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
A commit 1b6056d6 (pinctrl: samsung: Include bank-specific eint offset
in
bank struct) which is in your pinctrl tree (samsung branch) changed
Linus Walleij wrote:
Can you drop above 3 commits in your tree? If many conflicts happens
during
rebasing, how about that I merge your pinctrl/samsung branch into
Samsung
tree?...
Why not :-)
I have removed the samsung branch from my for-next to avoid
clashes.
Thanks ;-)
So
Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
A commit 1b6056d6 (pinctrl: samsung: Include bank-specific eint offset
in
bank struct) which is in your pinctrl tree (samsung branch) changed
macro(EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG) to add offset.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
A commit 1b6056d6 (pinctrl: samsung: Include bank-specific eint offset in
bank struct) which is in your pinctrl tree (samsung branch) changed
macro(EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG) to add offset. Eventually, this series(due to
3rd
Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch modifies the Samsung GPIO driver to check for pinctrl driver
presence earlier and use generic matching instead of a single compatible
value.
This allows us to fix warning about
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote:
This patch modifies the Samsung GPIO driver to check for pinctrl driver
presence earlier and use generic matching instead of a single compatible
value.
This allows us to fix warning about unrecognized SoC in case of
