On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> One of the biggest roadblocks on the way of S3C64xx to DeviceTree support
> is its DMA driver, which is completely platform-specific and provides
> private API (s3c-dma), not even saying that its design is completely
> against multiplat
On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > One of the biggest roadblocks on the way of S3C64xx to DeviceTree
> > support is its DMA driver, which is completely platform-specific and
> > provides private API (s3c-dma), n
On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > One of the biggest roadblocks on the way of S3C64xx to DeviceTree
> > > support is its DMA driver, which is completely platf
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:26:12PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
> > - ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
> > + ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);
> Hmm, that's strange. The former is a completely valid piece of code...
I
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:01:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > if (plchan->mux_use++ == 0 && pd->get_signal) {
> > > - ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
> > > + ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);
> > Hmm, that's
On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 20:22:11 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:26:12PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > - ret = pd->get_signal(plchan->cd);
> > > + ret = (pd->get_signal)(plchan->cd);
> >
> > Hmm, that
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 09:32:44PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 20:22:11 Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, I didn't - that's most likely it, I didn't really investigate. I
> > didn't test the watchdog stuff as the clocks didn't get sent to me.
> I always try to keep you on Cc
(Apologies if this is mangled, fighting both Outlook and remote desktop :-(
)
linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org wrote on Behalf Of Mark Brown
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:26:12PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 of June 2013 18:40:47 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > - ret = pd->get
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:24:47PM +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:
> Can you just make that minimal change, and diff the objdump of the two .o's?
> It would be worth a bug-report against the toolchain if different code was
> being generated. If objdump spews huge numbers of diffs (due to one address
>
> -Original Message-
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:24:47PM +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:
> > Can you just make that minimal change, and diff the objdump of the
> two .o's?
> > It would be worth a bug-report against the toolchain if different
> code
> > was being generated. If objdump spews huge
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:14:53PM +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:
> With my language-lawyer hat on, I'd suggest ``(get_signal)'' to prevent the
> macro expansion:
Right, which the patch I posted in the mail was doing IIRC.
> However, it's more tempting (i.e. sensible) to just rename the
> one with
11 matches
Mail list logo
