Mark Rutland wrote :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:32:48PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> > Mark Rutland :
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:27:46PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> > > > Mark Rutland :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the
> > >
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:32:48PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> Mark Rutland :
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:27:46PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> > > Mark Rutland :
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the
> > > > entire
> > > series
> > > > (though
Mark Rutland :
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:27:46PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> > Mark Rutland :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the
> > > entire
> > series
> > > (though the binding document should be a separate patch) as it
> > > provides
> > use
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:27:46PM +, Byungho An wrote:
> Mark Rutland :
> > Hi,
> >
> > As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the entire
> series
> > (though the binding document should be a separate patch) as it provides
> useful
> > context for reviewing the binding.
Mark Rutland :
> Hi,
>
> As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the entire
series
> (though the binding document should be a separate patch) as it provides
useful
> context for reviewing the binding.
OK.
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 06:47:13AM +, Byungho An wrote:
> > Fr
Hi,
As a general note it's helpful for devicetree to be Cc'd on the entire
series (though the binding document should be a separate patch) as it
provides useful context for reviewing the binding.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 06:47:13AM +, Byungho An wrote:
> From: Siva Reddy
>
> This patch adds
