On Wednesday 12 November 2014 10:14:58 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> [extending audience a bit]
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:42:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the S3C2410 NAND driver [1]
Hello again,
[extending audience a bit]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:42:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the S3C2410 NAND driver [1] can still be used for NANDs attached to an
> > S3C6410
> > SoC. But this drive
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:10:33PM +0100, Juergen Borleis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the S3C2410 NAND driver [1] can still be used for NANDs attached to an S3C6410
> SoC. But this driver has a "nice" feature called "clock off" to save some
> power while not in use. I tried it here on my Mini6410 platform an
Hi,
the S3C2410 NAND driver [1] can still be used for NANDs attached to an S3C6410
SoC. But this driver has a "nice" feature called "clock off" to save some
power while not in use. I tried it here on my Mini6410 platform and it freezes
the system.
The clock tree is somehow:
[...]
hclk
