On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:34:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 22:47 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > > On ma, 2006-10-30 at 11:13 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Any updates? Honestly, I do not plan to touch the cu
Update drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c and Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt
file with the current list of
adapters supported by the aacraid driver. Deprecated a few adapters that
never shipped, corrected a
few and added new adapters that matched the family code support. No
functional changes to the driv
Willy,
I'm forwarding this over to linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org because it seems
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was discontinued a few years ago.
Maybe the folks over there will be able to shed some light on this bug.
Mark.
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 00:03 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Thu,
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 14:48 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > if a tree falls in a forest but there's nobody around to hear it, does
> > it make a sound?
> >
> > This sort of heisenbug questions aren't solved by "nobody hears it so
> > lets chop do
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if a tree falls in a forest but there's nobody around to hear it, does
> it make a sound?
>
> This sort of heisenbug questions aren't solved by "nobody hears it so
> lets chop down the forest to make houses out of the wood" answers...
Does that mean
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 22:18 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One of the touted benefits of Linux is that we run on old hardware.
> > Unless the driver is demonstrably wrong (and they do become so as the
> > APIs evolve)
>
> Sure, I expect they do
On Fri, Dec 15 2006, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> Patch 2 of 2
>
> This patch fixes a stupid bug. Sometime during the 2tb enhancement I ended up
> replacing the macros XFER_READ and XFER_WRITE with h->cciss_read and
> h->cciss_write respectively. It seemed to work somehow at least on x86_64 and
>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 22:47 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > On ma, 2006-10-30 at 11:13 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Any updates? Honestly, I do not plan to touch the current 53c7xx/etc
> > > mess in the upoming request_buffer transition, and un
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 22:47 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote:
> On ma, 2006-10-30 at 11:13 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Any updates? Honestly, I do not plan to touch the current 53c7xx/etc
> > mess in the upoming request_buffer transition, and unless the m68k
> > folks provide the new 53c700-based
9 matches
Mail list logo
