On 9/21/07, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SG chaining bits:
- This is the bulk of the patchset. It consists of three major
components:
- sglist-core, which add helpers for iterating sg lists and
switches the block layer and SCSI to use those. Should not
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:19:13 +0200
Torsten Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/07, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SG chaining bits:
- This is the bulk of the patchset. It consists of three major
components:
- sglist-core, which add helpers for iterating sg lists and
Sep 18 18:50:01 treogen [ 63.44] ata1.00: status: {DRDY }
Sep 18 18:50:01 treogen [ 63.44] ata1: hard resetting link
Timed out waiting for data transfers to complete that didn't. Does sound
like the device got told the wrong sized transfer.
It then falls off the bus because Jeff
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:51 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:21:26AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
I'm in two minds about printing the 'Device not ready' twice. On the
one hand, it's redundant information. On the other hand, it helps the
harried sysadmin with
I've removed all uses of bus_to_virt[1] and virt_to_bus from the advansys
driver for the narrow card; it's now at the point where I can get 8MB/s
on a parisc machine [2]. But I don't have a wide advansys card, and the code
paths in the driver are very, very different. I think I know everything
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 09:20 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Oops. I fail to drive git-send-email properly again.
James, when you're committing this, please use the
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_scan: Cope with kthread_run failing
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 09:18:48AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
If
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 09:08:46AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
The main thing I don't like is that we've spent a lot of time moving
sense prints into a library so that if someone gullible^Wsensible enough
to want to do a reporting infrastructure comes along, we have all the
entry points
On 9/23/07, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:19:13 +0200
Torsten Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To update the statistik:
prior to 2.6.23-rc4-mm1: no trouble with any drives on the SiI 3132.
2.6.23-rc4-mm1 without patch: 2 out of 2 bad.
back to
On 9/23/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sep 18 18:50:01 treogen [ 63.44] ata1.00: status: {DRDY }
Sep 18 18:50:01 treogen [ 63.44] ata1: hard resetting link
Timed out waiting for data transfers to complete that didn't. Does sound
like the device got told the wrong sized
Douglas Gilbert wrote:
Is the lack of SMP support a driver limitation or is it
the silicon?
How about support for wide ports (i.e. when 2 or more HBA
phys are attached to remote phys which have the same SAS
addresses)?
Last question: can the chip run in SCSI target mode?
Just for
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 19:43 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 00:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Rather than sitting on this for far too long, I wanted to go ahead and
get this out there. I heard some chips might be trickling out into
public hands.
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 19:43 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 00:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Rather than sitting on this for far too long, I wanted to go ahead and
get this out there. I heard some chips might be trickling out into
12 matches
Mail list logo
