On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 02:35:14PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:26:31PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
> > There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people.
> > They had some type
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:13:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:47 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure if we can do this patch. If you kill a device, you see
> > > there's a processing state in scsi_prep_fn() for
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:47:59PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if we can do this patch. If you kill a device, you see
> > there's a processing state in scsi_prep_fn() for SDEV_DEL, which has a
> > printk message I see quite often when
Noticed on PowerPC allmod config build:
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1342: warning: large integer implicitly
truncated to unsigned type
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1343: warning: large integer implicitly
truncated to unsigned type
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1344: warning: large integer
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:25:43PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > >> >const char *name;
> > >> > + int (*filter_show)(struct kobj
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:58 +, Maarten Bressers wrote:
> > This patch is too simplistic. ide-cd.c:ide_cdrom_drive_status() looks
> > to be a reasonable implementation. However, the worry is that
> > GET_EVENT_NOTIFICATION is a MMC command; devices not conforming to MMC
> > won't support it.
On Oct 31, 2007 1:40 AM, Mark M. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 13:25:43 -0500]:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > > >> >const char
Hi James:
* James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 13:25:43 -0500]:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > >> >const char *name;
> > >> > + int (*filter_show
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 9:43:29 am James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
> > >> On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>> !E is for exported symb
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
I just don't see the reason why expressing a boolean as an integer. Some
advantage?
This is C, not Java, or some other highly-typed language.
if (int) and if (ptr) are perfectly acceptable in C.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:26:31PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
> There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people.
> They had some type of SoC implementation that needed to allocate local
> memory for device
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:43 -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> This interface only had one user (and two implementations).
> It complicates other work, so remove it.
Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people
Some of our vendors have requested that our adapters ignore the hardware
reset attempts during recovery and have enforced this with changes in
Adapter Firmware. Some of our customers have requested the option to be
able to reset the adapter under adverse adapter failure, we even had a
few defects r
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:25 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > >> > struct attribute_group {
> > >> >const char *name;
> > >> > + int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *,
This interface only had one user (and two implementations).
It complicates other work, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/DMA-API.txt | 78
Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt |1 -
arch/cris/arch-v32/driv
By restructuring the ncr53c8xx driver a little, we can provide
the same functionality as the dma_declare_coherent_memory interface
without touching the generic dma paths.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/NCR_Q720.c | 45 ---
drivers/scsi/ncr53c
James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, so is this latest revision acceptable to everyone?
No complaint from me. (I'm more or less by accident in this thread
anyway. Once this feature is available in mainline, I may have use for
it in drivers/firewire/ though.) Thanks,
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== =-=-
As reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9133 it was
discovered that the PERC line of controllers lacked a key 64 bit
ScatterGather capable SCSI pass-through function. The adapters are still
capable of 64 bit ScatterGather I/O commands, but these two can not be
mixed. This problem
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> >> > struct attribute_group {
> >> > const char *name;
> >> > +int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
>
> > Actually, it returns a true/false value indicating
On Tue, Oct 30 2007 at 19:49 +0200, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> lots of drivers changed yet again do to latest SG API fixes.
> There is no use me sending all of them again. They are available
> on a public git tree.
>
> you can pull them from:
> git-pull git://bhalevy.com/ope
Hi
lots of drivers changed yet again do to latest SG API fixes.
There is no use me sending all of them again. They are available
on a public git tree.
you can pull them from:
git-pull git://bhalevy.com/open-osd accessors
They are based on todays scsi-misc tree. If you want that I preform
any cha
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:51:48AM -0400, bo yang wrote:
> +/*
> + * Number of sectors per IO command will be set in megasas_init_mfi
> + * if user does not provide
> + */
> +static unsigned int max_sectors;
> +module_param_named(max_sectors, max_sectors, int, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_sectors,
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> I just don't see the reason why expressing a boolean as an integer. Some
> advantage?
This is C, not Java, or some other highly-typed language.
if (int) and if (ptr) are perfectly acceptable in C.
> (also helps us if someone doe
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:46:51AM -0400, bo yang wrote:
> +/*
> + * Fast driver load option, skip scanning for physical devices during
> + * load. This would result in physical devices being skipped during
> + * driver load time. These can be later added though,
> + * using /proc/scsi/scsi
> + */
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:26 -0600, Yang, Bo wrote:
> James,
>
> We submitted the "03.16-rc1" (megaraid_sas) patches about three weeks
> back. Do you have any feedback or we need to re-submit the patches?
Randy Dunlap asked you why the module parameters were invisible ... is
there a reason (if n
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 10:54, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Diffed against linus-git
Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
index 451accd..6f56528 10
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Convert to use the generic boolean.
- u8 initialized;
- u8 in_use; /* is the
By setting the request_limit in send_srp_login to 1 we allowed login
requests to be sent to the server adapter. If this was not an initial
login, but was a login after a disconnect with the server, other I/O
requests could attempt to be processed before the login occured. These
I/O requests would
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 10:54, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Diffed against linus-git
> Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
> index 451accd..6f56528 100644
> --- a
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:36:05PM +0800, jameshsu wrote:
> Hello James Bottomley,
>
> This driver has nothing changed since last time submit.
> However recently we check the 2.6.23.1 kernel and found code is not
> up-to-date (still remain @2005).
> Resend this message to submit the same driver ag
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> >
> >>Convert to use the generic boolean.
> >>- u8 initialized;
> >>- u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
> >>+
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Convert to use the generic boolean.
- u8 initialized;
- u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
+ bool initialized:8;
+ bool in_use:8; /* is the management
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:57:07 -0700
> Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:34:52 -0700
>>> Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:34:18 -0700
> Seokmann
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Convert to use the generic boolean.
> - u8 initialized;
> - u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
> + bool initialized:8;
> + bool in_use:8; /* is the management node open*/
Are you seri
ACK
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Richard Knutsson
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
> Richard Knutsson
> Subject
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Entirely possible I'm doing something wrong:
>
>
> include/scsi
Brian King wrote:
The following three patches convert ipr to use the new libata EH APIs.
In the process of doing this, I first looked into implementing this
in a similar manner to how libata SAS is done today, which is hooking
into target_alloc/target_destroy to allocate/delete sata ports. While
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 15:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:28:10AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > OK, so it's no secret that I'm the last of the subsystem maintainers
> > whose day job isn't working on the linux kernel. If you want a full
> > time person, who did you
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
Entirely possible I'm doing something wrong:
include/scsi/scsi_device.h
!Einclude/scsi/scsi_device.h
!E is for exported symbols a
Hello James Bottomley,
This driver has nothing changed since last time submit.
However recently we check the 2.6.23.1 kernel and found code is not
up-to-date (still remain @2005).
Resend this message to submit the same driver again. (.c diff file under
atp870u.c.diff.bz2 format)
Please help Acard
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Diffed against linus-git
Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
index 451accd..6f56528 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
@@ -3158,31 +
Convert to use the generic boolean.
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Diffed against linus-git
Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
(warned about long lines, but it is not introduced by this patch)
dpt_i2o.c | 22 +++---
dpti.h|9 ++---
2 files
jameshsu wrote:
Should be in TEXT/PLAIN mode. --- resend
Hello,
This driver has nothing changed since last time submit.
However recently we download 2.6.23.1 kernel and found Acard ATP8620 SATA
driver is still not there.
Resend this message to submit the same driver aga
This patch looks a lot better and is how seq_file should be used. I'm still
not entirely happy about adding more features to this long-deprecated interface,
but if others agree with this patch you'll get my ACK aswell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:29:27 -0500,
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:27 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > > visibility and creation are the same thing, aren't they? An invisible
> > > attribute doesn't appear in the sysfs directory, so i
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:24:06 -0500,
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you determine which subset of the attributes you want just before
> > actually creating the group? Then you could do something like:
> >
> > create_group(grp, kobj)
> > {
> > grp->update_creation_mask(kobj)
46 matches
Mail list logo
