On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:24:06 -0500,
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you determine which subset of the attributes you want just before
actually creating the group? Then you could do something like:
create_group(grp, kobj)
{
grp-update_creation_mask(kobj);
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:29:27 -0500,
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:27 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
visibility and creation are the same thing, aren't they? An invisible
attribute doesn't appear in the sysfs directory, so it's
Convert to use the generic boolean.
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Diffed against linus-git
Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
(warned about long lines, but it is not introduced by this patch)
dpt_i2o.c | 22 +++---
dpti.h|9 ++---
2 files
Hello James Bottomley,
This driver has nothing changed since last time submit.
However recently we check the 2.6.23.1 kernel and found code is not
up-to-date (still remain @2005).
Resend this message to submit the same driver again. (.c diff file under
atp870u.c.diff.bz2 format)
Please help Acard
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
Entirely possible I'm doing something wrong:
sect1 id=scsi_device.h
titleinclude/scsi/scsi_device.h/title
para
/para
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 15:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:28:10AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
OK, so it's no secret that I'm the last of the subsystem maintainers
whose day job isn't working on the linux kernel. If you want a full
time person, who did you have
Brian King wrote:
The following three patches convert ipr to use the new libata EH APIs.
In the process of doing this, I first looked into implementing this
in a similar manner to how libata SAS is done today, which is hooking
into target_alloc/target_destroy to allocate/delete sata ports. While
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
Entirely possible I'm doing something wrong:
sect1 id=scsi_device.h
ACK
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Knutsson
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org;
Richard Knutsson
Subject:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Convert to use the generic boolean.
- u8 initialized;
- u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
+ bool initialized:8;
+ bool in_use:8; /* is the management node open*/
Are you serious?
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:57:07 -0700
Seokmann Ju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:34:52 -0700
Seokmann Ju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:34:18 -0700
Seokmann Ju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Convert to use the generic boolean.
- u8 initialized;
- u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
+ bool
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Convert to use the generic boolean.
- u8 initialized;
- u8 in_use; /* is the management node open*/
+ bool initialized:8;
+ bool in_use:8; /* is the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:36:05PM +0800, jameshsu wrote:
Hello James Bottomley,
This driver has nothing changed since last time submit.
However recently we check the 2.6.23.1 kernel and found code is not
up-to-date (still remain @2005).
Resend this message to submit the same driver again.
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 10:54, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Diffed against linus-git
Checked with script/checkpatch.pl
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw.h
index 451accd..6f56528 100644
---
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:26 -0600, Yang, Bo wrote:
James,
We submitted the 03.16-rc1 (megaraid_sas) patches about three weeks
back. Do you have any feedback or we need to re-submit the patches?
Randy Dunlap asked you why the module parameters were invisible ... is
there a reason (if not
James Bottomley wrote:
OK, so is this latest revision acceptable to everyone?
No complaint from me. (I'm more or less by accident in this thread
anyway. Once this feature is available in mainline, I may have use for
it in drivers/firewire/ though.) Thanks,
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== =-=-
By restructuring the ncr53c8xx driver a little, we can provide
the same functionality as the dma_declare_coherent_memory interface
without touching the generic dma paths.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/NCR_Q720.c | 45 ---
This interface only had one user (and two implementations).
It complicates other work, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/DMA-API.txt | 78
Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt |1 -
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:25 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
struct attribute_group {
const char *name;
+ int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
Some of our vendors have requested that our adapters ignore the hardware
reset attempts during recovery and have enforced this with changes in
Adapter Firmware. Some of our customers have requested the option to be
able to reset the adapter under adverse adapter failure, we even had a
few defects
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:43 -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
This interface only had one user (and two implementations).
It complicates other work, so remove it.
Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:26:31PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people.
They had some type of SoC implementation that needed to allocate local
memory for device
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote:
I just don't see the reason why expressing a boolean as an integer. Some
advantage?
This is C, not Java, or some other highly-typed language.
if (int) and if (ptr) are perfectly acceptable in C.
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 9:43:29 am James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 08:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:40:35 -0500 Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 12:32:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
!E is for exported symbols and that
Hi James:
* James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 13:25:43 -0500]:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
struct attribute_group {
const char *name;
+ int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *,
On Oct 31, 2007 1:40 AM, Mark M. Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 13:25:43 -0500]:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
struct attribute_group {
const char *name;
+
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:58 +, Maarten Bressers wrote:
This patch is too simplistic. ide-cd.c:ide_cdrom_drive_status() looks
to be a reasonable implementation. However, the worry is that
GET_EVENT_NOTIFICATION is a MMC command; devices not conforming to MMC
won't support it. In
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:25:43PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
struct attribute_group {
const char *name;
+ int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
Noticed on PowerPC allmod config build:
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1342: warning: large integer implicitly
truncated to unsigned type
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1343: warning: large integer implicitly
truncated to unsigned type
drivers/scsi/aacraid/commsup.c:1344: warning: large integer
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:47:59PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
I'm not sure if we can do this patch. If you kill a device, you see
there's a processing state in scsi_prep_fn() for SDEV_DEL, which has a
printk message I see quite often when I
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:13:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 14:47 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
I'm not sure if we can do this patch. If you kill a device, you see
there's a processing state in scsi_prep_fn() for SDEV_DEL,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 02:35:14PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:26:31PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Its design was basically to facilitate the use of bus remote memory.
There's a long thread somewhere discussing this with the ARM people.
They had some type of
33 matches
Mail list logo
