Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs

2007-11-22 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Laurent Riffard wrote: > Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit : >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100 >> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs

2007-11-22 Thread Laurent Riffard
Le 21.11.2007 23:41, Andrew Morton a écrit : > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0100 > Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Le 21.11.2007 05:45, Andrew Morton a écrit : >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm1/ >> Hello, >> >> My system

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1

2007-11-22 Thread Gabriel C
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:08 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have some warnings on each SCSI disc: >> >> >> ... >> >> [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW >> 0109 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3 >> [ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queui

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1

2007-11-22 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:08 +0100 Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some warnings on each SCSI disc: > > > ... > > [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW 0109 > PQ: 0 ANSI: 3 > [ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32 > [ 30

Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1

2007-11-22 Thread Gabriel C
I have some warnings on each SCSI disc: ... [ 30.724410] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SEAGATE ST318406LW 0109 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3 [ 30.724419] scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32 [ 30.724435] target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation [ 30.724446] target0:0:0: Domain Vali

Re: [patch 02/23] nsp32_restart_autoscsi(): remove error check

2007-11-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
AFAIR, this was the nsp32_msg() James wanted to keep, and the patch should therefore be dropped. cu Adrian On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:12:15PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The Coverity checker noted that we'll anyway Oops later when we ran into > t