Good to know that somebody still uses the Ultrastor 14f board :).
Yes, this typo was introduced by somebody doing massive editing to all
scsi drivers long ago.
Cheers,
--db
-Original Message-
From: Roel Kluin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:37 PM
To:
On Feb 4, 2008 11:57 PM, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Networked block devices are attractive because the concepts and
implementation are more simple than networked filesystems... but usually
you want to run some sort of filesystem on top. At that point you might
as well run NFS or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good to know that somebody still uses the Ultrastor 14f board :).
Yes, this typo was introduced by somebody doing massive editing to all
scsi drivers long ago.
Cheers,
--db
Actually, I do not own a Ultrastor 14f board. I found this by searching for
if (test)
...
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:53:21 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Convert SG from nopage to fault.
Please give this some additional attention. We'd like to remove
vm_operations_struct.nopage() altogether and we can't do that while
it's hanging around in
On Mon, Feb 04 2008 at 22:05 +0200, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Matthew Dharm wrote:
But, the modifications to usb_stor_access_xfer_buf() look good -- no
request from a sub-driver should be allowed to scribble into memory. The
current code does make the implicit
On Mon, Feb 04 2008 at 20:32 +0200, Salyzyn, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACK with condition that community accepts the RFC's entire premise.
The removed code that shunted the REQUEST_SENSE was based on the assumption
that the sense data in the current scsi command packet was left over from
On Tue, Feb 05 2008, S, Chandrakala (STSD) wrote:
Hello,
We would like to know in which kernel version these patches are
available.
They were merged after 2.6.24 was released, so they will show up in the
2.6.25 kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hello,
We would like to know in which kernel version these patches are
available.
Thanks,
Chandrakala
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Axboe
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 1:16 PM
To: Kiyoshi Ueda
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Hello folks,
Diskdump on x3850 with adp94xx driver is not working (Redhat Enterprise Linux 4.6).
'Service diskdump restart' fails. Is there any plan to support it?
Thanks
Ciju
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 05:57:47PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI and NBD were passe ideas at birth. :)
Networked block devices are attractive because the concepts and
implementation are more simple than networked filesystems... but usually
you want to run some sort of filesystem on top.
Added support for hotplug and wide port.
Signed-off-by: Ke Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/mvsas.c | 445 ++
1 files changed, 339 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas.c
index
I do not think the midlayer needs to be fixed. I think this was a bug/feature
that presented itself in the 2.2 tree when we were developing this driver in
1996...
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-Original Message-
From: Boaz Harrosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of SCST in kernel plus
the problem of having to find a migration
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:43:10 +0100
Matteo Tescione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
And sorry for intrusion, i am not a developer but i work everyday with iscsi
and i found it fantastic.
Altough Aoe, Fcoe and so on could be better, we have to look in real world
implementations what is needed
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Mon, 2/4/08, Boaz Harrosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 3 usages of sense handling in drivers
1. sense is available in driver internal structure and is
mem-copied to upper level
2. A
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:07:01 -0600
Chris Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is
way
better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
However the interface to usb_stor_access_xfer_buf() will have to change
slightly. Right now if it sees that *sgptr is NULL, it assumes this
means it should start at the beginning of the s-g buffer. But with
Boaz's change, *sgptr == NULL means the
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:35 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote:
I guess the same could be said for STGT and SCST,
right?
You mean both of their kernel pieces are modular?
That's correct.
No, you know very well what I mean.
By the same logic you're preaching to include your
solution part
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 23:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aha152x.c and fdomain are built twice - once for the isa driver and once
for the PCMCIA one. Through #ifdefs, the compiled codes are slightly
different; thus, global symbols need to be given
When sending a SCSI command to a tape drive via the SCSI Generic (sg)
driver, if the command has a data transfer length more than
scatter_elem_sz (32 KB default) and not a multiple of 512, then I either
hit BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction)) in dma_unmap_sg() or else
the command never
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
commit 9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a
Merge: 50d9a12... 23c3e29...
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jan 25 17:19:08 2008 -0800
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6
*
FUJITA Tomonori schrieb:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of SCST in kernel plus
the problem of having
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
commit 9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a
Merge: 50d9a12... 23c3e29...
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jan 25 17:19:08 2008 -0800
Merge
On Mon, Feb 04 2008 at 19:33 +0200, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 17:30 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
This patch defines a new API for sense handling. All drivers will
be converted to this API, before the sense handling implementation will
change. API is as
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:07 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori schrieb:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
Even if they weren't,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
Could you load the (default 2.6.24) driver with
ql2xextended_error_logging modules parameter set:
# insmod qla2xxx ql2xextended_error_logging=1
and send the resultant kernel logs?
Could you tray the patch referenced here:
qla2xxx:
Regarding the performance tests I promised to perform: although until
now I only have been able to run two tests (STGT + iSER versus SCST +
SRP), the results are interesting. I will run the remaining test cases
during the next days.
About the test setup: dd and xdd were used to transfer 2 GB of
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
commit 9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a
Merge: 50d9a12... 23c3e29...
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jan 25 17:19:08 2008 -0800
Merge
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
commit 9b73e76f3cf63379dcf45fcd4f112f5812418d0a
Merge: 50d9a12... 23c3e29...
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jan 25 17:19:08 2008 -0800
Merge
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
and send the resultant kernel logs?
Here's the output to the console (if there are other logs you need,
let me know). I'll try the patch next, and sorry, hadn't realized
merges were still coming in under 2.6.24 in Linus' tree...
QLogic Fibre
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:07:07 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUJITA Tomonori schrieb:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
Even
On Tue, Feb 05 2008 at 17:42 +0200, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
However the interface to usb_stor_access_xfer_buf() will have to change
slightly. Right now if it sees that *sgptr is NULL, it assumes this
means it should start at the beginning
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:28 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:22:06PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
(Added Bart to CC)
hello borislav,
may i forward you that *old* Debian kernel bug,
have seen you
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:21:33 -0500
Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53 +0200:
FIXME: I need help with this driver (Pete?)
I used scsi_sense() in a none const way. But since
scsi_tgt is the ULD here, it can just access it's own
Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 12:32 AM, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iSER has parameters to limit the maximum size of RDMA (it needs to
repeat RDMA with a poor configuration)?
Please specify which parameters you are referring to. As you know I
had already
Bart Van Assche wrote:
As you probably know there is a trend in enterprise computing towards
networked storage. This is illustrated by the emergence during the
past few years of standards like SRP (SCSI RDMA Protocol), iSCSI
(Internet SCSI) and iSER (iSCSI Extensions for RDMA). Two different
On 5-02-2008 14:38, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being independently worked on, are they not?
Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make O=../out/x86-full
...
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_seq.h
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_reg.h
CC drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.o
gcc: drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:05:58PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I think the correct approach is to modify those routines so that they
will never overrun the s-g buffer (like Boaz has done), and _document_
this behavior. Then the callers can feel free
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:21:33 -0500
Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53 +0200:
FIXME: I need help with this driver (Pete?)
I used scsi_sense() in a none const way. But since
scsi_tgt is the ULD here, it can
Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 11:57 PM, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Networked block devices are attractive because the concepts and
implementation are more simple than networked filesystems... but usually
you want to run some sort of filesystem on top. At that point you might
Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 05:57:47PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI and NBD were passe ideas at birth. :)
Networked block devices are attractive because the concepts and
implementation are more simple than networked filesystems... but usually
you want to run some sort
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make O=../out/x86-full
...
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_seq.h
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_reg.h
CC
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make O=../out/x86-full
...
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_seq.h
SHIPPED drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_reg.h
CC
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:18:04PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make O=../out/x86-full
...
SHIPPED
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:24 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:18:04PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:30:56PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:24 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:18:04PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit
This email somehow didn't manage to make it to the list (I suspect
because it had html attachments).
James
---
From:
Julian Satran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Nicholas A. Bellinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:30:56 -0600
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
Do I assume from this that you have different source and object
directories? There shouldn't be a failure if this is building
in /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/ because the source file
should be there.
James
Erez Zilber wrote:
Bart Van Assche wrote:
As you probably know there is a trend in enterprise computing towards
networked storage. This is illustrated by the emergence during the
past few years of standards like SRP (SCSI RDMA Protocol), iSCSI
(Internet SCSI) and iSER (iSCSI Extensions for
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI is way, way too complicated.
I fully agree. From one side, all that complexity is unavoidable for
case of multiple connections per session, but for the regular case of
one connection per session it must be a lot simpler.
Actually,
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:59 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Hmm, how can one write to an mmaped page and don't touch it?
I meant from user space ... the writes are done inside the kernel.
Sure, the mmap() approach agreed to be unpractical, but could you
elaborate more on this
Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI is way, way too complicated.
I fully agree. From one side, all that complexity is unavoidable for
case of multiple connections per session, but for the regular case of
one connection per session it must be a lot simpler.
Actually, think about those multiple
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the same could be said for STGT and
SCST,
right?
You mean both of their kernel pieces are modular?
That's correct.
No, you know very well what I mean.
By the same logic you're preaching to include
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way
better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and
low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with.
Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'd assumed the move was primarily because of the difficulty of getting
correct semantics on a shared filesystem
.. not even shared. It was hard to get correct semantics full stop.
Which is a traditional problem. The thing is, the kernel always has some
internal
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:38 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 20:56 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 20:16 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
James Bottomley
Linus Torvalds wrote:
So just going by what has happened in the past, I'd assume that iSCSI
would eventually turn into connecting/authentication in user space with
data transfers in kernel space.
This is exactly how iSCSI-SCST (iSCSI target driver for SCST) is
implemented, credits to IET and
On Feb 5, 2008 6:10 PM, Erez Zilber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One may claim that STGT should have lower performance than SCST because
its data path is from userspace. However, your results show that for
non-IB transports, they both show the same numbers. Furthermore, with IB
there shouldn't be
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Mon, 2/4/08, Boaz Harrosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 3 usages of sense handling in drivers
1. sense is available in driver
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:47:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make O=../out/x86-full
...
SHIPPED
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:15 -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:58 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:32 -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
Subject: scsi_dh: Add support for SDEV_PASSIVE
From: Chandra Seetharaman [EMAIL
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 21:06 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:47:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$ make
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 11:33 -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Wrong ... we don't export non-SCSI devices as SCSI
(with the single and
rather annoying exception of ATA via SAT).
I didn't say you should do that. I had already
mentioned that vendors export such controls
as either enclosure or
Tony Battersby wrote:
When sending a SCSI command to a tape drive via the SCSI Generic (sg)
driver, if the command has a data transfer length more than
scatter_elem_sz (32 KB default) and not a multiple of 512, then I either
hit BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction)) in dma_unmap_sg() or else
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong ... we don't export non-SCSI devices as
SCSI
(with the single and
rather annoying exception of ATA via SAT).
I didn't say you should do that. I had already
mentioned that vendors export such controls
as either
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:06:23PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:47:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit 8891fec65ac5b5a74b50c705e31b66c92c3eddeb broke aic7xxx
compilation:
-- snip --
$
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, Ke Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ for_each_phy(port-wide_port_phymap, no, j, mvi-chip-n_phy) {
+ mvs_write_port_cfg_addr(mvi, no, PHYR_WIDE_PORT);
+ mvs_write_port_cfg_data(mvi, no , port-wide_port_phymap);
+ } else {
+
index 4c54954..6aa49e7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/Makefile
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ clean-files += aic79xx_seq.h aic79xx_reg.h
aic79xx_reg_print.c
# Dependencies for generated files need to be listed explicitly
-$(addprefix
Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When IO is sent to a path that cannot execute IO optimally, the scsi hw
handler hook for sense processing (see rdac_check_sense in [PATCH 8/9]
scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler and the scsi_error.c hook in in
scsi_dh: add skeleton for SCSI Device
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 22:21 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI is way, way too complicated.
I fully agree. From one side, all that complexity is unavoidable for
case of multiple connections per session, but for the regular case of
one connection per session
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:16:51 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:40:56 -0600
Subject: [SCSI] enclosure: add support for enclosure services
The enclosure misc device is really just a library providing sysfs
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:12 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI is way, way too complicated.
I fully agree. From one side, all that complexity is unavoidable for
case of multiple connections per session, but for the regular case of
one
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:56 -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
Mike Christie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When IO is sent to a path that cannot execute IO optimally, the scsi hw
handler hook for sense processing (see rdac_check_sense in [PATCH 8/9]
scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler and the
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 22:01 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way
better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and
low-level, and against those crazy SCSI
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 16:48 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 22:01 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is
way
better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Mon, 2/4/08, Boaz Harrosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:09:15 +0100
Matteo Tescione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5-02-2008 14:38, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley schrieb:
These are both features being
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 16:11 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 22:21 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
iSCSI is way, way too complicated.
I fully agree. From one side, all that complexity is unavoidable for
case of multiple connections
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:29 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:09:15 +0100
Matteo Tescione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5-02-2008 14:38, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100
Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Tue, 2/5/08, FUJITA Tomonori
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Mon, 2/4/08, Boaz Harrosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 3
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 16:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:16:51 -0600
James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:40:56 -0600
Subject: [SCSI] enclosure: add support for enclosure services
The
82 matches
Mail list logo
