Wow, been ages since the last patch to this driver has hit my mail:-)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Denis Efremov wrote:
> The replacement of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq pair in interrupt
> handler by spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock_irqrestore pair.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtest
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 10:40 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Any chance of these patches get merged into 3.6?
Not 3.6 given that the series was only finalised a week into the merge
window. Generally because of the merge frenzy, linux-next doesn't work
very well during this period so there'
The replacement of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq pairs which
can be called from interrupt handler by irqsave/irqrestore
versions.
Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov
---
drivers/scsi/tmscsim.c | 12 ++--
drivers/scsi/tmscsim.h |
On 07/30/2012 10:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>> So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could
>> instead
>>> fix it by simplifying the whole thing as follow since iSeries is now
>>> gone and so we don't need split ba
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Brian King wrote:
>
> On 07/30/2012 10:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >>> So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could
> >> instead
> >>> fix it by simplifying the whole thing as f
Add a MAINTAINERS entry for the IBM Power Virtual SCSI and FC device
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings
---
MAINTAINERS |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index fb036a0..f441c46 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
Hi Y'all,
First let me apologize if this is the wrong venue to post this question.
If it is not, please point me to the correct spot if possible!
We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel
2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We installed a LSI 9201-16e SAS HBA in it,
upgraded to the lat
On 7/31/2012 11:00 PM, Erich Weiler wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> First let me apologize if this is the wrong venue to post this question.
> If it is not, please point me to the correct spot if possible!
>
> We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel
> 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We install
Hi Stan,
Thanks for replying!
We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel
2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We installed a LSI 9201-16e SAS HBA in it,
upgraded to the latest firmware (9116 chipset). Then we attached a LSI
DE2660 JBOD array to it, with 60 hard drives.
TTBOMK LSI never ma
Il 31/07/2012 22:52, Eric Northup ha scritto:
> It seems to me like this is not the way that virtio devices are supposed
> to behave - if a guest splits a virtio_scsi_cmd_req or _resp across a
> page boundary, then this code won't work.
Buffers can cover several pages. Of course, data buffers hav
10 matches
Mail list logo