Re: [PATCH] tmscsim: spin_unlock_irq in interrupt handler fix

2012-07-31 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Wow, been ages since the last patch to this driver has hit my mail:-) On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Denis Efremov wrote: > The replacement of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq pair in interrupt > handler by spin_lock_irqsave/spin_lock_irqrestore pair. > > Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtest

Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] ZPODD patches

2012-07-31 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 10:40 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > Hi James, > > Any chance of these patches get merged into 3.6? Not 3.6 given that the series was only finalised a week into the merge window. Generally because of the merge frenzy, linux-next doesn't work very well during this period so there'

[PATCH v2] tmscsim: spin_unlock_irq in interrupt handler fix

2012-07-31 Thread Denis Efremov
The replacement of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq pairs which can be called from interrupt handler by irqsave/irqrestore versions. Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov --- drivers/scsi/tmscsim.c | 12 ++-- drivers/scsi/tmscsim.h |

Re: [PATCH] scsi/ibmvscsi: add module alias for ibmvscsic

2012-07-31 Thread Brian King
On 07/30/2012 10:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: >>> So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could >> instead >>> fix it by simplifying the whole thing as follow since iSeries is now >>> gone and so we don't need split ba

Re: [PATCH] scsi/ibmvscsi: add module alias for ibmvscsic

2012-07-31 Thread Robert Jennings
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Brian King wrote: > > On 07/30/2012 10:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:06 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > >>> So while this would work, I do wonder however whether we could > >> instead > >>> fix it by simplifying the whole thing as f

[PATCH] ibmvscsi: Add maintainer for IBM virtual SCSI/FC drivers

2012-07-31 Thread Robert Jennings
Add a MAINTAINERS entry for the IBM Power Virtual SCSI and FC device drivers. Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings --- MAINTAINERS |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index fb036a0..f441c46 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS

SCSI disk IO problem with JBOD

2012-07-31 Thread Erich Weiler
Hi Y'all, First let me apologize if this is the wrong venue to post this question. If it is not, please point me to the correct spot if possible! We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We installed a LSI 9201-16e SAS HBA in it, upgraded to the lat

Re: SCSI disk IO problem with JBOD

2012-07-31 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 7/31/2012 11:00 PM, Erich Weiler wrote: > Hi Y'all, > > First let me apologize if this is the wrong venue to post this question. > If it is not, please point me to the correct spot if possible! > > We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel > 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We install

Re: SCSI disk IO problem with JBOD

2012-07-31 Thread Erich Weiler
Hi Stan, Thanks for replying! We have a Dell R610 server running CentOS 6.3 (kernel 2.6.32-279.2.1.el6.x86_64). We installed a LSI 9201-16e SAS HBA in it, upgraded to the latest firmware (9116 chipset). Then we attached a LSI DE2660 JBOD array to it, with 60 hard drives. TTBOMK LSI never ma

Re: [RFC-v5] tcm_vhost: Initial merge for vhost level target fabric driver

2012-07-31 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 31/07/2012 22:52, Eric Northup ha scritto: > It seems to me like this is not the way that virtio devices are supposed > to behave - if a guest splits a virtio_scsi_cmd_req or _resp across a > page boundary, then this code won't work. Buffers can cover several pages. Of course, data buffers hav