Lockdep reports:
=== [ cut here ] ===
=
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted
-
qla2xxx_1_dpc/368 just changed the
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 11:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 09:16 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report
On 10/08/2012 12:53 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Lockdep reports:
=== [ cut here ] ===
=
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set
Hi James,
Please let me know if you are expecting any more changes to this driver
to resume its review. I have addressed all review comments as of the
last series of patches (below).
Thanks,
Naresh.
On 9/24/2012 10:47 PM, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
This is the initial submission of the Chelsio
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 15:37 +0530, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
Please let me know if you are expecting any more changes to this driver
to resume its review. I have addressed all review comments as of the
last series of patches (below).
No, I don't think so, but please understand that the review
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 11:59:29AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:23 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
James, Robert-
I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I was
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 09:54:32AM -0700, Robert Love wrote:
This patch does a few things.
1) Makes /sys/bus/fcoe/ctlr_{create,destroy} interfaces.
These interfaces take an ifname and will either
create an FCoE Controller or destroy an FCoE
Controller depending on which file is
-Original Message-
From: K. Y. Srinivasan [mailto:k...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:04 PM
To: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; jbottom...@parallels.com;
h...@infradead.org;
Acked-by: Saurav Kashyap saurav.kash...@qlogic.com
Thanks,
~Saurav
Compiling qla_gs.o (part of the qla2xxx module) triggers two GCC
warnings:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function Œqla2x00_fdmi_rhba¹:
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c:1339:7: warning: array subscript is
above array
Acked-by: Saurav Kashyap saurav.kash...@qlogic.com
Thanks,
~Saurav
Lockdep reports:
=== [ cut here ] ===
=
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.6.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #1 Not tainted
12 matches
Mail list logo
