Hi James,
Could you please let me know when this patch would be pushed?
Thanks,
Naresh.
On 11/20/2012 6:15 PM, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
> This patch fixes sparse warnings related to endian-ness, which were
> reported by the 0-day kernel build and testing tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar In
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Vinayak Holikatti
only for drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 58f4ba6..4a370f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1947,
On 27/11/2012 06:04, David Dillow wrote:
We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is
pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce
merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the
RDMA tree
Yep, this makes sense to me even witho
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 09:57 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:44 AM, David Dillow wrote:
> > One may also pull this series from github:
> > git pull git://github.com/dillow/srp-initiator.git ha-merge-v1
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> The kernel maintainers file specifies the followi
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 23:15 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> > James B.
> >instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> > (I think)
> > - I se
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:46 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > The state of the target has several conditions that overlap, making it
> > easier to model as a bit-field of exceptional conditions rather than an
> > enum of all possible states.
> >
> > Bart Van
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:17 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > Once we know we have an issue with the QP, there is no point trying to
> > send anything else down the pipe. This also allows us to consolidate
> > code in the SCSI EH path.
> After I posted the
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:43 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> > From: Bart Van Assche
> >
> > Some SCSI upper layer drivers, e.g. sd, issue SCSI commands from
> > inside scsi_remove_host() (see also the sd_shutdown() call in
> > sd_remove()). Make sure that
On 11/26/2012 09:17 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> Well, ZPREADY is not a power state that we can program the ODD to
>> enter(figure 234 and table 323 of the SPEC), it servers more like an
>> information provided by ODD to host so that host does n
> "Rob" == Rob Evers writes:
Rob> These patches replace the original t10 type 2 dif mempool
Rob> implementation by increasing the block and scsi cdb maximum sizes
Rob> from 16 to 32 bytes. The cdb embedded in the request structure can
Rob> then be used for type 2 dif commands, or other 32 by
> "Stefan" == Stefan Richter writes:
Stefan,
Stefan> I did not try "sg_write_same" on any of the devices; but since
Stefan> the two SPC-3 devices are correctly identified as "fully
Stefan> provisioned", won't issue WRITE SAME to them either.
What if you have an SSD behind one of them?
Ste
On 11/19/2012 7:41 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi all,
just when we thought we'd finally nailed the error handling on FC ...
A customer of ours recently hit this really nasty issue:
He had a 'drain' on the SAN, in the sense that the link was still
intact, but no commands were coming back from t
> I'm amenable to that, but we do need an agreed patch set, as Roland
> says. I also hate to apply the pressure, but I suspect -rc7 was the
> last -rc, so I'm expecting the merge window to open on 2/12.
I think the srp_transport bits are all simple and non-controversial.
So at least from my persp
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 11:21 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > I'm also curious about driving sleep from autopm, since mode page timers
> > don't control the sleep transition.
>
> Is it feasible to do this the other way around? That is, to drive
> runti
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi /
> James B.
>instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff
> (I think)
> - I see Bart had a few comments about a few of your patches, I'll
> wait
>
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
From: Ishai Rabinovitz
HW QP FATAL errors persist over a reset operation, but we can recover
from that by recreating the QP and associated CQs for each connection.
Creating a new QP/CQ also completely forecloses any possibility of
getting stale completions
Thanks, applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> This series compiles, but is otherwise UNTESTED. I'll be working on that
> over the next few days, with an eye on getting as much of Bart's work
> into 3.8 as possible.
Hi Dave,
Great to have you back. Certainly I'd like to get this stuff into 3.8 too.
A couple of comments:
- I think the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:22:21PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
> needed.
>
...
> drivers/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c | 6 +-
For vmw_pvscsi:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this li
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:20:46PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
> needed.
>
...
> drivers/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c | 2 +-
For vmw_pvscsi:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this l
On 11/21/12 08:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hmm.
> This would still mean that the eh thread will run until finished.
> Which can take _A LOT_ of time (we're speaking hours here).
> I would rather have an additional return code in the various
> scsi_try_XXX functions to terminate the loop quickly.
On 11/23/12 11:37, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/26/12 14:00, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Fix a few race conditions that can be triggered by removing a device:
>> [ ... ]
>
> I'd like to add the patch below to this series. [ ... ]
Below is another patch (hopefully the last) that I'd like to add to
cc Lukasz and Maciej from Intel and changing Dan William's email
On 11/21/2012 03:07 PM, Rob Evers wrote:
These patches replace the original t10 type 2 dif mempool implementation
by increasing the block and scsi cdb maximum sizes from 16 to 32 bytes.
The cdb embedded in the request structure c
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, James Bottomley wrote:
> I'm also curious about driving sleep from autopm, since mode page timers
> don't control the sleep transition.
Is it feasible to do this the other way around? That is, to drive
runtime suspend by noticing when the device decides to put itself into
This patch reduces lock contention while implementing distributed
completion processing.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 322 +
drivers/scsi/ipr.h | 21 +--
2 files changed, 239 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
Index: b/d
Bump driver version.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.h |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/scsi/ipr.h
===
--- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.h2012-11-19 12:18:58.263935158 -0600
+
This patch implements blk iopoll in ipr driver for performance improvement.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 218 +
drivers/scsi/ipr.h |6 +
2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
The new generation IBM SAS Controllers will support MSI-X interrupts and
Distributed Completion Processing features. This patch add these support
in ipr device driver.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 716 -
drivers/scsi/ipr.h
Add code to handle memory allocation failures at module load time.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Brian King
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
Index: b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
===
--- a/
Add the appropriate definitions and table entries for new adapter support.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 10 ++
drivers/scsi/ipr.h |5 +
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
Index: b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
==
The new generation IBM SAS controllers will support MSI-X interrupt and
Distributed Completion Processing features. The patches in this series
add the code to support these new hardware features and also add some
patches for performance improvement such as block iopoll and reducing
lock contention
The resource path as displayed by the ipr driver is the
location string identifying a location on the SAS fabric.
This patch adds the SCSI host number such that error logs
can be more easily correlated in multiple adapter configurations.
Signed-off-by: Brian King
---
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 78 +
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 16:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Well, ZPREADY is not a power state that we can program the ODD to
> enter(figure 234 and table 323 of the SPEC), it servers more like an
> information provided by ODD to host so that host does not need to do TUR
> and then examine the sense code
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
The state of the target has several conditions that overlap, making it
easier to model as a bit-field of exceptional conditions rather than an
enum of all possible states.
Bart Van Assche did the hard work of identifying the states that can be
removed, and
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
> From: Bart Van Assche
>
> Some SCSI upper layer drivers, e.g. sd, issue SCSI commands from
> inside scsi_remove_host() (see also the sd_shutdown() call in
> sd_remove()). Make sure that these commands have a chance to reach
> the SCSI device.
>
> Signed-o
On 11/26/12 05:44, David Dillow wrote:
Once we know we have an issue with the QP, there is no point trying to
send anything else down the pipe. This also allows us to consolidate
code in the SCSI EH path.
[ ... ]
@@ -1683,7 +1681,7 @@ static int srp_send_tsk_mgmt(struct srp_target_port
*targe
On 11/26/2012 03:32 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:09 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 11/26/2012 01:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 01:33 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2012 03:06:51 PM James Bottomley wrote:
>> I really
37 matches
Mail list logo
