RE: [PATCH V3 01/12] pm80xx: fix for memory region free

2013-04-11 Thread Anand Kumar Santhanam
Hi James, Thanks for the feedback. We have resubmitted all the patches starting from 1st patch in this V3 patchset. The first patch (given below) does not contain pm8001_80xx_dispatch reference. Maybe you have already applied patch 1 and 2 from earlier patchset and trying to apply patch 1 from

RE: [PATCH V3 02/12] pm80xx: Added SPCv/ve specific ids, variables and modify for SPC

2013-04-11 Thread Anand Kumar Santhanam
Hi James, Did you take the patch attachment from the email? Pls let us know as to which version of diff tool you are using. I used the patch command to apply this patch against 3.8-rc6 tree to check whether the patch is applying properly. Regards Anand -Original Message- From: James

[PATCH 18/26] megaraid: Don't use create_proc_read_entry() [RFC]

2013-04-11 Thread David Howells
Don't use create_proc_read_entry() as that is deprecated, but rather use proc_create_data() and seq_file instead. Signed-off-by: David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com cc: Neela Syam Kolli megaraidli...@lsi.com cc: James E.J. Bottomley jbottom...@parallels.com cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org ---

[PATCH] checkpatch: Make camelcase test --strict and less noisy

2013-04-11 Thread Joe Perches
CamelCase tests are a bit noisy against certain types of code acceptable to some kernel developers. Make the test applicable only with --strict. Do not bleat a message on nominally acceptable CamelCase uses that are separated by an _ like drm_core_has_MTRR. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches

Re: [PATCH V3 02/12] pm80xx: Added SPCv/ve specific ids, variables and modify for SPC

2013-04-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 23:36 -0700, Anand Kumar Santhanam wrote: Hi James, Did you take the patch attachment from the email? Pls let us know as to which version of diff tool you are using. I used the patch command to apply this patch against 3.8-rc6 tree to check whether the patch is

Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling

2013-04-11 Thread Jeremy Linton
On 2/1/2013 11:53 AM, Ewan D. Milne wrote: The mechanism used is to flag when certain UA ASC/ASCQ codes are received that report asynchronous changes to the storage device configuration. An appropriate uevent is then generated for the scsi_device or scsi_target object. An aggregation

Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi_transport_iscsi: Declare portal type string macros for generic use

2013-04-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 20:37 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: Patches 1 - 3 look ok to me. it looks like we're missing a patch 3/3? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

RE: [PATCH V3 02/12] pm80xx: Added SPCv/ve specific ids, variables and modify for SPC

2013-04-11 Thread Anand Kumar Santhanam
Hi James, I will double check the same. Also can you pls provide the tool which you are using to apply the patch and also the kernel version? I will ensure that we locally apply the patches before sending to the list. Regards Anand -Original Message- From: James Bottomley

RE: [PATCH V3 01/12] pm80xx: fix for memory region free

2013-04-11 Thread Anand Kumar Santhanam
Hi James, Are you still seeing compilation issue? Do we need to rework on this patchset? Pls let us know. Regards Anand -Original Message- From: Anand Kumar Santhanam Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:05 PM To: 'James Bottomley' Cc: 'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'; Harry Yang; Rich Bono;

Re: [PATCH V3 02/12] pm80xx: Added SPCv/ve specific ids, variables and modify for SPC

2013-04-11 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 19:38 -0700, Anand Kumar Santhanam wrote: Hi James, I will double check the same. Also can you pls provide the tool which you are using to apply the patch and also the kernel version? It's git and the tip of the SCSI misc branch I will ensure that we locally apply the